The 'Up or Down Vote' talking point is
dead
Daily Kos
October 27, 2005
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
"They have gotten away with obstructing by exploiting the filibuster and
denying Justice Owen a direct vote. Now, unfortunately, we must take action to
ensure President Bush's nominees are getting the up-or-down vote they deserve."
(4/21/05 statement)
Sen. Orrin Hatch
"...I think we should bind both Democrats and Republicans that presidential
nominees for the judiciary deserve an up-and-down vote once they reach the
floor..." (Orrin Hatch discusses debate in Senate..., NPR, 5/19/05)
Sen. Jon Kyl
"All we seek is a return to 214 years of tradition in allowing presidential
nominees the courtesy of an up-or-down vote." (Kyl Calls for `Up or Down' Vote
on Judicial Nominees,' Capitol Hill Press Releases, 5/18/05)
Sen. Rick Santorum
"The time has come for the Senate to reestablish that tradition, to end
these destructive judicial filibusters and to give all judicial nominees the
up-or-down vote they deserve." (Should the Senate end Filibusters When
Considering Judicial Appointments, Duluth News Tribune, 4/25/05)
Sen. Trent Lott
"...I felt they deserved up-or-down votes. It was not a popular action with
my colleagues, but I didn't think it was right to filibuster judicial nominees
then. And it's not right now." (Lott Sets the Record Straight on Judicial
Confirmation Issue, 4/26/05)
Sen. John Cornyn
"And we need to get a fresh start. And that means, I believe, an up-or-down
vote for all presidents' nominees whether they be Republican or Democrat."
(U.S. Senator John Cornyn Holds a News Conference on Judicial Nominees, CQ
Transcriptions, 5/9/05)
Sen. Mitch McConnell
"Let's get back to the way the Senate operated for over 200 years, up or
down votes on the president's nominee, no matter who the president is, no
matter who's in control of the Senate. That's the way we need to operate."
(Senators Durbin & McConnell Discuss Issues Facing the Senate, CNN,
5/22/05)
Sen. Jeff Sessions
"This past election in large part hinged, as George Allen said, on a debate
over the judiciary and whether or not obstruction was justified. I think the
American people sent a clear message and I believe it's time for this Senate to
make sure that judges get an up-or-down vote." (U.S. Sen. Allen & Other
Senate Republicans Hold a Media Availability on the Possibility of a Democrat
Filibuster, CQ Transcriptions, 3/15/05)
Sen. Richard Burr
"But denying these patriotic Americans, of both parties, who seek to serve
this country an up-or-down vote is simply not fair, and it certainly was not
the intention of our Founding Fathers when they designed and created this very
institution." (Sen. Burr Speaks Out on Judicial Nominations, 4/20/05)
Sen. Sam Brownback
"All of the president's nominees-both now and in the future-deserve a fair
up or down vote, regardless of whether some members of the Senate feel they can
be filibustered based on whatever they define to be extraordinary
circumstances." (Sen. Brownback Issues Statement on Judicial Nominees,
5/24/05)
Sen. John Thune
"However, I still believe that all judicial nominees with majority support
deserve the fairness of an up or down vote on the Senate floor... Something is
broken when you can't get a fair up or down vote, not because of qualifications
or character, but because of politics." (Senators Find Good in Filibuster
Agreement, AP, 5/24/05)
Sen. George Allen
"They want Senators to do their jobs and hold a straight up-or-down vote on
nominees based on their qualifications, not the baseless negative rhetoric of
the left...In summation, Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, and all of the
President's nominees, deserve a fair up-or-down vote." (U.S. Senator George
Allen Deliver Remarks on the Senate Floor on Judicial Nominations, CQ
Transcriptions, 5/18/05)
Sen. Chuck Hagel
"I am disappointed that the agreement reached by 14 senators does not
guarantee up-or-down votes on all of the president's nominees...That is a basic
principle that should have anchored any agreement." (Hagel Calls Senators' Pact
Inadequate, Omaha World-Herald, 5/25/05)
Sen. Pete Domenici
"Since the day I came to the U.S. Senate in 1973, I have believed strongly
that every nominee deserves an up or down vote. That is why over all these
years, I have never once voted to filibuster any nominee, even the ones that I
ended up opposing. I am truly saddened that the Senate has reached this point.
We should resume our long-standing tradition of giving judicial nominees who
reach the floor an up or down vote." (Sen. Domenici Laments Continued Judicial
Filibusters, 5/19/05)
Sen. Charles Grassley
"The current obstruction led by Senate Democratic leaders threatens that
balance. Priscilla Owen and Janice Rogers Brown deserve an up or down vote.
It's high time to make sure all judges receive a fair up or down vote on the
Senate floor." (Grassley: Give Judges a Fair Up or Down Vote, CQ, 5/23/05)
Sen. Wayne Allard
"I'd made my position clear. I wanted to have an up- or-down vote on the
judges." (Freshman Salazar Stands with his Seniors, The Denver Post,
5/24/05)
Sens. Larry Craig and Mike Crapo
"We are pleased that three of the President's judicial nominees will receive
fair up-or-down votes - it is about time. However, we continue to stress that
the Constitution requires the Senate to hold up-or-down votes on all nominees.
We will continue to work to ensure that is the case." (Craig, Crapo React to
Judicial Nominees Deal, 5/25/05)
Sen. Ted Stevens
"I may not have always agreed with a judicial nominee pick, but I've never
voted against cloture on a judicial nomination. There have been some petitions.
And I've always agreed that we should allow an up-or-down vote on judicial
nominations on the Senate floor. These nominees deserve our vote." (Press
Conference on Judges, Federal News Service, 5/19/05)
Sen. Jim DeMint
"My goal is to confirm highly qualified judges by ensuring timely up-or-down
votes for all nominees... Every nominee, no matter if the President is Democrat
or Republican, deserves an up-or-down vote," (Sens. DeMint, Freshman GOP Call
for end to Judicial Filibusters, 4/20/05)
Sen. Elizabeth Dole
"I think that it's very important that we reinstate the tradition, the
Senate tradition, of 220 years, throughout the entire history of the United
States. We've had a system that worked, that, when a nominee on the floor has a
clear majority of the senators in favor, that they're going to get that
up-or-down vote." (Interview with Senator Elizabeth Dole, The Big Story with
John Gibson, 4/21/05)
|