House Bill To Weakens Environmental
Standards
Yahoo News/AP
By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer
October 7, 2005
WASHINGTON - A Republican measure to help the oil industry make more
gasoline, and perhaps ease prices at the pump, faces a close vote in the House
after critics — from the Sierra Club to state and local officials —
complained it would lead to more air pollution and could force communities to
accept unwanted refineries.
"I think it will be a tight vote," Rep. Joe Barton , R-Texas, said Thursday.
Barton drafted the bill in response to the soaring gasoline prices unleashed
after hurricanes Katrina and Rita heavily damaged a dozen refineries in the
gulf region, cutting off 20 percent of the country's domestic gasoline
supply.
Barton says vulnerabilities in the fuel supply system exposed by the
hurricanes shows that the country needs to build more refineries, especially
away from the Gulf Coast region.
The legislation, scheduled for a House vote Friday before lawmakers depart
for a weeklong recess, is aimed at giving industry assurances that lengthy
government reviews and new environmental hurdles do not block refinery
expansion — and even prompt investors to build a new refinery.
No refineries have been built in the United States since 1976 as the
industry has consolidated to fewer, but larger facilities.
The GOP legislation also would limit to six the different blends of gasoline
and diesel fuel that refiners would be required to produce, reversing a trend
of using so-called "boutique" fuels to satisfy clean air demands. And it would
give the federal government greater say in siting a refinery and pipeline. It
also calls on the president to designate military bases or other federal
property where a refinery might be built.
But opponents, including most Democrats and some moderate Republicans, have
accused Barton and GOP leaders of using the hurricane devastation to push
through proposals long sought by industry, including some not related to
refineries at all.
For example, the bill would give some cities longer to meet federal clean
air standards and it would allow not only refineries, but also coal-burning
power plants and other industries to expand or change operations without adding
new pollution controls even if, in some cases, emissions increase.
It is a change long sought industry groups and the Bush administration, but
currently is bogged down in the courts because of lawsuits from a number of
states.
"The bill weakens state and federal environmental standards ... and gives a
break to wealthy oil companies while doing little or nothing to affect oil
prices," Rep. Sherwood Boehlert , R-N.Y., said in a letter Thursday to
colleagues.
With prices soaring, "oil companies now have all the profits and incentives
they need to build new refineries" without government help, he maintained.
Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California said the "anti-environment,
anti-consumer" legislation was laden with the same GOP proposals to help oil
companies that Congress rejected when it passed a sweeping energy bill just two
months ago.
Barton rejected the notion that the bill will lead to a weakening of
environmental protection. It will give industry more "certainty" that a
refinery project will not be delayed "without lessening any environmental law
now on the books," he insisted to reporters Thursday.
"The bill sets in motion a chain of events for lowering gas prices for
Americans," he said.
Among the groups trying to kill the bill are the National League of Cities,
nine state attorneys general, most environmental organizations and groups
representing state officials in charge of implementing federal clean air
requirements. They said the bill would hinder their ability to assure clean and
healthy air.
Environmentalists also have argued that the limit to six gasoline types
could jeopardize the requirement for use of low-sulfur diesel fuel. The
low-sulfur diesel regulations have been touted by the Bush administration as
one of the Environmental Protection Agency's most significant
accomplishments.
A shortage of U.S. refining capacity has been a concern raised by oil
industry groups long before Katrina and Rita.
In 1981, the United States had 325 refineries capable of producing 18.6
million barrels a day. Today there are fewer than half that number, producing
16.9 million barrels daily. Still refining capacity has been increasing, though
not dramatically, for the last decade. Imports have made up the difference as
demand has continued to increase.
The bill number is H.R. 3893. Additional information can be found at
http://thomas.loc.gov
|