FBI Violated Patriot Act
Washington Post
FBI Papers Indicate Intelligence Violations
Secret Surveillance Lacked Oversight
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, October 24, 2005; Page A01
The FBI has conducted clandestine surveillance on some U.S. residents for as
long as 18 months at a time without proper paperwork or oversight, according to
previously classified documents to be released today.
Records turned over as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit also
indicate that the FBI has investigated hundreds of potential violations related
to its use of secret surveillance operations, which have been stepped up
dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks but are largely hidden from
public view.
In one case, FBI agents kept an unidentified target under surveillance for
at least five years -- including more than 15 months without notifying Justice
Department lawyers after the subject had moved from New York to Detroit. An FBI
investigation concluded that the delay was a violation of Justice guidelines
and prevented the department "from exercising its responsibility for oversight
and approval of an ongoing foreign counterintelligence investigation of a U.S.
person."
In other cases, agents obtained e-mails after a warrant expired, seized bank
records without proper authority and conducted an improper "unconsented
physical search," according to the documents.
Although heavily censored, the documents provide a rare glimpse into the
world of domestic spying, which is governed by a secret court and overseen by a
presidential board that does not publicize its deliberations. The records are
also emerging as the House and Senate battle over whether to put new
restrictions on the controversial USA Patriot Act, which made it easier for the
government to conduct secret searches and surveillance but has come under
attack from civil liberties groups.
The records were provided to The Washington Post by the Electronic Privacy
Information Center, an advocacy group that has sued the Justice Department for
records relating to the Patriot Act.
David Sobel, EPIC's general counsel, said the new documents raise questions
about the extent of possible misconduct in counterintelligence investigations
and underscore the need for greater congressional oversight of clandestine
surveillance within the United States.
"We're seeing what might be the tip of the iceberg at the FBI and across the
intelligence community," Sobel said. "It indicates that the existing mechanisms
do not appear adequate to prevent abuses or to ensure the public that abuses
that are identified are treated seriously and remedied."
FBI officials disagreed, saying that none of the cases have involved major
violations and most amount to administrative errors. The officials also said
that any information obtained from improper searches or eavesdropping is
quarantined and eventually destroyed.
"Every investigator wants to make sure that their investigation is handled
appropriately, because they're not going to be allowed to keep information that
they didn't have the proper authority to obtain," said one senior FBI official,
who declined to be identified by name because of the ongoing litigation. "But
that is a relatively uncommon occurrence. The vast majority of the potential
[violations] reported have to do with administrative timelines and time frames
for renewing orders."
The documents provided to EPIC focus on 13 cases from 2002 to 2004 that were
referred to the Intelligence Oversight Board, an arm of the President's Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board that is charged with examining violations of the
laws and directives governing clandestine surveillance. Case numbers on the
documents indicate that a minimum of 287 potential violations were identified
by the FBI during those three years, but the actual number is certainly higher
because the records are incomplete.
FBI officials declined to say how many alleged violations they have
identified or how many were found to be serious enough to refer to the
oversight board.
Catherine Lotrionte, the presidential board's counsel, said most of its work
is classified and covered by executive privilege. The board's investigations
range from "technical violations to more substantive violations of statutes or
executive orders," Lotrionte said.
Most such cases involve powers granted under the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act, which governs the use of secret warrants, wiretaps and other
methods as part of investigations of agents of foreign powers or terrorist
groups. The threshold for such surveillance is lower than for traditional
criminal warrants. More than 1,700 new cases were opened by the court last
year, according to an administration report to Congress.
In several of the cases outlined in the documents released to EPIC, FBI
agents failed to file annual updates on ongoing surveillance, which are
required by Justice Department guidelines and presidential directives, and
which allow Justice lawyers to monitor the progress of a case. Others included
a violation of bank privacy statutes and an improper physical search, though
the details of the transgressions are edited out. At least two others involve
e-mails that were improperly collected after the authority to do so had
expired.
Some of the case details provide a rare peek into the world of FBI
counterintelligence. In 2002, for example, the Pittsburgh field office opened a
preliminary inquiry on a person to "determine his/her suitability as an asset
for foreign counterintelligence matters" -- in other words, to become an
informant. The violation occurred when the agent failed to extend the inquiry
while maintaining contact with the potential asset, the documents show.
The FBI general counsel's office oversees investigations of alleged
misconduct in counterintelligence probes, deciding whether the violation is
serious enough to be reported to the oversight board and to personnel
departments within Justice and the FBI. The senior FBI official said those
cases not referred to the oversight board generally involve missed deadlines of
30 days or fewer with no potential infringement of the civil rights of U.S.
persons, who are defined as either citizens or legal U.S. resident aliens.
"The FBI and the people who work in the FBI are very cognizant of the fact
that people are watching us to make sure we're doing the right thing," the
senior FBI official said. "We also want to do the right thing. We have set up
procedures to do the right thing."
But in a letter to be sent today to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sobel
and other EPIC officials argue that the documents show how little Congress and
the public know about the use of clandestine surveillance by the FBI and other
agencies. The group advocates legislation requiring the attorney general to
report violations to the Senate.
The documents, EPIC writes, "suggest that there may be at least thirteen
instances of unlawful intelligence investigations that were never disclosed to
Congress."
|