Cheney Must Explain CIA Leak Role--or
Resign
E&P
By E&P Staff
October 30, 2005
NEW YORK Nicholas Kristof, whose New York Times column in May 2003 helped
set in motion the "Plamegate" scandal, called today for Vice President Dick
Cheney to explain his role in the matter or resign.
It was an unexpected proposal from Kristof, who has long been skeptical
about criminal wrongdoing in this case. In fact, he opens today's column with
an apology to federal prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.
What Kristof now points to is a detail in the Libby indictments, that Cheney
had learned from the C.I.A. that Joe Wilson's wife worked at the agency and
told Libby that on about June 12, 2003.
Kristof observes that he can't stop wondering if Libby's alleged perjury
"was purely his own idea and whether Mr. Cheney was aware of it.
"Since Mr. Libby is joined at the hip to Mr. Cheney, it's reasonable to ask:
What did Mr. Cheney know and when did he know it? Did the vice president have
any grasp of the criminal behavior allegedly happening in his office? We
shouldn't assume the worst, but Mr. Cheney needs to give us a full account.
"Instead, Mr. Cheney said in a written statement: 'Because this is a pending
legal proceeding, in fairness to all those involved, it would be inappropriate
for me to comment on the charges or on any facts relating to the
proceeding.'
"Balderdash. If Mr. Cheney can't address the questions about his conduct, if
he can't be forthcoming about the activities in his office that gave rise to
the investigation, then he should resign. And if he won't resign, Mr. Bush
should demand his resignation.
"It's not that there's a lick of evidence that Mr. Cheney is a criminal.
There isn't. But the standard of the office should be higher than that: the
White House should symbolize integrity, not legalistic refusals to discuss
criminal cover-ups. I didn't want technical indictments of White House
officials because they inflame partisanship and impede government; for just the
same reason, it's unsavory when a vice president resorts to technical defenses
and clams up."
E&P Staff (letters@editorandpublisher.com)
|