UN denied access into Iraq before looting
Boston Globe
Allegations made on Iraq arms sites
By Farah Stockman and Bryan Bender, Globe Staff
October 30, 2004
WASHINGTON -- United Nations weapons inspectors pressed for
permission to return to Iraq to help monitor weapons sites on the
heels of the US-led invasion but were denied entry by the US-led
coalition, according to a former inspector, UN officials, and a
letter from the International Atomic Energy Agency obtained by
the Globe.
The sites included Al Qaqaa, a sprawling facility about 30
miles south of Baghdad. At least 377 tons of powerful explosives,
including the particularly dangerous substance known as HMX, have
vanished from that location.
"They wanted to go. They were begging to go," said David
Albright, a former weapons inspector who now heads the Institute
for Science and International Security and who lobbied in vain
for the UN agency in April 2003 to be allowed to resume work in
Iraq. "They would have gone to Al Qaqaa and said, 'Here's the
HMX. Burn it.' They would have been a driver of efforts to find
these things. . . . They would have provided a tremendous
service."
Yesterday, a US official said the inspectors' request to
return to Iraq was denied because of "logistics and timing" and
because the United States and Britain took on the
inspections-related work.
"The US and the UK were taking the lead in searching for the
arms, and there was really no reason" to allow the inspectors
back, said Joe Merante, spokesman for the US mission to the
UN.
Still, even now, the US military is unsure when the bunkers
containing HMX at Al Qaqaa were searched after the war and how
the munitions disappeared.
The missing explosives that had been monitored by the UN
agency before the war have become a heated campaign issue in the
final days before the election, as candidates trade accusations
about under whose watch the munitions vanished.
Democratic challenger John F. Kerry has accused the Bush
administration of allowing the explosives to fall into the hands
of insurgents, while the White House and Pentagon suggest that
the explosives may have been destroyed by US soldiers or taken by
former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein shortly before the war.
The controversy of the Al Qaqaa munitions erupted months after
another team of UN weapons inspectors reported evidence of
widespread looting at other weapons sites. The UN Monitoring and
Verification Commission, a group that monitors non-nuclear
weapons activity in Iraq from its New York headquarters, found 20
missile engines in a scrap yard in Jordan this summer and 22
other missile engines in the Netherlands, the group reported in
August.
Before the war, inspectors had asked for more time to search
for banned weapons, while President Bush and other high-level US
officials said UN inspectors and sanctions were not working and
swift action had to be taken. The inspectors left Iraq in March
2003, on the eve of the invasion, and asked to return in April
and May, as the war unfolded and news reports detailed massive
looting of radioactive material at Al Tuwaitha.
Page 2 of 2 -- "I am anxious to send an expert mission to
undertake a professional appraisal of the situation," Mohamed
ElBaradei, head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog, wrote to
Kenneth Brill, the US representative to the agency, on April 29,
2003, more than five weeks after the invasion began. "You are
well aware of my view that the IAEA has a legal and moral
responsibility . . . to resume its work in Iraq as soon as
practicable."
ElBaradei's letter notes that "other international
humanitarian personnel have begun to return."
About eight IAEA inspectors were allowed to return for a short
time in May and June to help clean up a specific site at Al
Tuwaitha known as Location C, which had been hard hit by looting.
But they were strictly prohibited by US forces from entering
other locations at Al Tuwaitha and were not allowed to travel to
other sites of concern, according to Albright and a Vienna-based
UN official familiar with that mission.
"There was a terrible sense of frustration that we couldn't do
our job," the Vienna-based official said, speaking on the
condition of anonymity.
Although the IAEA officials were most concerned about
protecting nuclear sites, they also were eager to get back to Al
Qaqaa because inspectors wanted to investigate the discrepancy
between the amount of HMX reported by Hussein's government in
2002 and the amount they recorded and sealed in January 2003,
according to Albright and an IAEA official.
Albright said he recalls a phone conversation in May 2003 with
a senior IAEA official who wanted to return to Al Qaqaa.
"He talked of the need for inspectors to go back to Iraq
because they had an intimate knowledge of Iraqi facilities and
felt an obligation to resume monitoring," Albright said. "He then
mentioned the explosives at Al Qaqaa in the context of worrying
that someone would take it and make truck bombs."
While UN inspectors who had monitored Iraq's weapons
facilities for nearly a decade were prevented from returning to
Al Qaqaa, US soldiers who went to the facility have said they
were not fully aware of what the site contained. On April 18,
2003, a Minnesota-based news crew videotaped soldiers exploring
bunkers full of unguarded explosives in what is believed to be
the southern edge of the sprawling Al Qaqaa facility. The
soldiers did not recognize the copper seal, which the IAEA said
was affixed by its inspectors, on the door of a bunker that
apparently led to a massive cache of HMX.
HMX was being monitored by the agency, together with two other
explosives, because they can be used to detonate a nuclear
bomb.
"That makes me nervous there," one soldier said on the video
taken by embedded journalists with KSTP-TV, an ABC affiliate in
Minneapolis. "What's the lead seal? Why would they seal it?"
US soldiers were unaware of the presence of HMX at Al Qaqaa
after the war even though the IAEA had warned about it in public
reports, and even though it was the US military that discovered
the same cache during the first Gulf War in 1991, according to an
IAEA spokesman.
It is not clear whether the 75th Exploitation Task Force, the
army contingent that was responsible for searching for weapons of
mass destruction in Iraq, was specifically looking for HMX. An
unclassified version of a Pentagon self-assessment report on
Iraq, released in March, said the 75th had little experience or
training in their mission and that the brigade had been swiftly
assigned a host of other tasks. By the time the Iraqi Survey
Group, a larger US-appointed team that replaced the 75th headed
by former UN weapons inspector David Kay, reached the facility in
August 2003, the HMX was gone.
Yesterday, Major Austin Pearson, an officer for the Army's
Third Infantry Division who led postwar operations at the Al
Qaqaa site, said at a Pentagon news briefing that the HMX was a
fraction of the munitions scattered in bunkers across Iraq. He
said he removed nine trucks worth of TNT, plastic explosives, and
detonation cords from the site on April 13. He could not remove
all the explosive material and could not be certain that any of
the material he did remove was HMX, he said.
"I did not see any IAEA seals," Pearson said. "I was not
looking for that."
Farah Stockman can be reached at fstockman@globe.com.
© Copyright 2004 Globe Newspaper Company.
|