Alito rejected abortion as a
right
Washington Times
By Bill Sammon
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
November 14, 2005
Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, wrote
that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion" in a 1985
document obtained by The Washington Times.
"I personally believe very strongly" in this legal position, Mr. Alito wrote
on his application to become deputy assistant to Attorney General Edwin I.
Meese III.
The document, which is likely to inflame liberals who oppose Judge Alito's
nomination to the Supreme Court, is among many that the White House will
release today from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.
In direct, unambiguous language, the young career lawyer who served as
assistant to Solicitor General Rex E. Lee, demonstrated his conservative bona
fides as he sought to become a political appointee in the Reagan
administration.
"I am and always have been a conservative," he wrote in an attachment to the
noncareer appointment form that he sent to the Presidential Personnel Office.
"I am a lifelong registered Republican."
But his statements against abortion and affirmative action might cause him
headaches from Democrats and liberals as he prepares for confirmation hearings
before the Senate Judiciary Committee, scheduled for January.
"It has been an honor and source of personal satisfaction for me to serve in
the office of the Solicitor General during President Reagan's administration
and to help to advance legal positions in which I personally believe very
strongly," he wrote.
"I am particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which the
government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and ethnic quotas should
not be allowed and that the Constitution does not protect a right to an
abortion."
A leading Republican involved in the nomination process insisted that this
does not prove Judge Alito, if confirmed to the Supreme Court, will overturn
Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling that made abortion a
constitutional right.
"No, it proves no such thing," said the Republican, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity. "In fact, if you look at some of the quotes of his
former law clerks, they don't believe that he'll overturn Roe v. Wade."
Judge Alito sided with abortion proponents in three of four rulings during
his 15 years as a judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Philadelphia, usually based on existing law and technical legal issues rather
than the right to abortion itself.
"The issue is not Judge Alito's political views during the Reagan
administration 20 years ago," the Republican official said. "It's his 15 years
of jurisprudence, which can be evaluated in hundreds of opinions. And in none
of those opinions is it evident what his political philosophy is.
"Ruth Bader Ginsburg had a long history of advocacy on behalf of liberal
causes, but she was evaluated on her 13-year record as a federal judge and her
jurisprudence, not her belief that there was a constitutional right to
prostitution or polygamy."
Although Judge Alito's conservatism has not been particularly evident in his
legal rulings, it was abundantly clear in his job application 20 years ago.
"I believe very strongly in limited government, federalism, free enterprise,
the supremacy of the elected branches of government, the need for a strong
defense and effective law enforcement, and the legitimacy of a government role
in protecting traditional values," he wrote.
"In the field of law, I disagree strenuously with the usurpation by the
judiciary of decision-making authority that should be exercised by the branches
of government responsible to the electorate," he added.
The document also provides the clearest picture to date of Mr. Alito's
intellectual development as a conservative.
"When I first became interested in government and politics during the 1960s,
the greatest influences on my views were the writings of William F. Buckley
Jr., the National Review, and Barry Goldwater's 1964 campaign," he said. "In
college, I developed a deep interest in constitutional law, motivated in large
part by disagreement with Warren Court decisions, particularly in the areas of
criminal procedure, the Establishment Clause, and reapportionment."
Republicans are relishing the opportunity to defend Judge Alito's support
for judicial restraint, saying it puts him squarely in the majority of American
public opinion.
As evidence, they pointed to public outrage over a 2002 ruling by the 9th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco that said the phrase "under God"
in the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. More recently, the Supreme
Court has ruled that government can seize property and give it to a private
party for the sake of the "public good." Other Supreme Court rulings have cited
international law.
"We're delighted to have a debate over judicial philosophy and the proper
role of courts in America," a Republican strategist said. "That's a debate the
Republican Party wins every time."
Republicans also pointed out that Judge Alito's devotion to Reagan
administration policy was reminiscent of those of Supreme Court Chief Justice
John G. Roberts Jr., who also served in the Reagan administration and was
confirmed in September by all Republicans and half the Democrats in the
Senate.
"The notion that working for the Reagan administration is a disqualifier for
serving on the Supreme Court was decisively refuted by 78 votes earlier in the
summer when John Roberts was confirmed," said the official close to the Alito
nomination process.
|