It's war: the CIA vs
Bush
The Australian
Robert Lusetich, Los Angeles correspondent
November 16, 2004
FEARING its boundless power and authority will be seriously
eroded, the Central Intelligence Agency is mounting a
not-so-covert operation - in the media against the Bush White
House - for its very survival.
It is "an insurgency", in the words of a Wall Street Journal
editorial, that the CIA is unlikely to win.
However, failure is not a result the beleaguered agency is
unfamiliar with, given its inability to stop the September 11
attacks -- even though it knew a number of the terrorist
hijackers were in the US -- and its infamous assertion that
finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq would be a "slam
dunk".
With Congress debating the recommendations of the 9/11
commission, which will certainly see the CIA's powers curtailed
and the agency re-made, the world's most notorious spy
organisation has become "dysfunctional" and a "rogue agency",
influential Republican senator John McCain said yesterday.
Senator McCain echoed the anger within the White House over
the CIA "old guard" trying to get John Kerry elected by leaking
unflattering stories about the Bush administration during the
final month of the presidential campaign.
With former Florida Republican and Bush political ally Porter
Goss as new head of the CIA, the career spies have mounted a
rear-guard action, which consists of leaking stories about the
lowest morale at the agency since the ill-fated Bay of Pigs
invasion in 1961, and the danger of experienced operatives being
forced out to settle political scores.
"The agency is being purged on instructions from the White
House," said a former CIA official. "Goss was given instructions
... to get rid of those soft leakers and liberal Democrats. The
CIA is looked on by the White House as a hotbed of liberals and
people who have been obstructing the President's agenda."
Jim Pavitt, a 31-year CIA veteran, said last month that he had
not seen this level of "viciousness and vindictiveness" between
and a government and the CIA.
Mr Goss, however, seems unmoved, labelling the agency's
directorate of operations -- the most powerful and secretive
group within the CIA -- as dysfunctional.
Last week the No 2 man at the CIA, John McLaughlin, resigned,
reportedly after clashing with the new leadership. Head of
espionage Stephen Kappes is rumoured to also be on his way out as
Mr Goss, a former CIA officer and chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee, clears the decks.
"This kind of shake-up is absolutely necessary," said Senator
McCain, who further noted the US now knows little more about Iran
and North Korea than it did 10 years ago.
"(Goss) is being savaged by these people that want the status
quo, and the status quo is not satisfactory."
Meanwhile one of the CIA's harshest Bush critics, Mike
Scheuer, a 22-year veteran who has written two books that were
critical of the US's handling of the war on terror, has
resigned.
Scheuer's latest book Imperial Hubris goes against key White
House assertions. He believes Osama bin Laden is not on the run,
the invasion of Iraq has not made the US safer, and that
Islamists are in a campaign of insurgency, not terrorism, against
the US because of US policies, not out of hatred for
Americans.
Astonishingly, Scheuer, while a CIA employee, was given full
clearance to promote his book.
"As long as the book was being used to bash the President,
they (CIA executives) gave me carte blanche to talk to the
media," he said.
Appearing on 60 Minutes yesterday, Scheuer -- who once headed
the CIA unit responsible for bin Laden -- called the Saudi-born
terrorist "a great man in the sense that he's influenced the
course of history".
He also said bin Laden had secured a fatwah from a Saudi sheik
authorising the use of nuclear weapons against the US.
|