Judge Rules Guantanamo Trials
Unlawful
The Washington Post
By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 9, 2004; 3:13 PM
Military trials set up to determine the guilt or innocence of
enemy combatants imprisoned at a U.S. military prison in Cuba are
unlawful and cannot continue in their current form, a federal
judge ruled this afternoon.
In a major setback to the Bush administration, U.S. District
Judge James Robertson found that detainees held at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, may legally be prisoners of war entitled to the
protections of international law and should be allowed a hearing
on whether they qualify for those protections.
Robertson determined that the military commissions the
Pentagon created after the Sept. 11, 2001, invasion of
Afghanistan, to try and sentence the detainees are not lawful or
proper. He found that commission rules allowed that the first
person scheduled to go to trial on charges of terrorist acts
could be denied access to evidence and excluded from some
commission sessions, in violation of military law.
The judge ruled that unless and until the military gives
detainees a fair hearing before a "competent tribunal" on whether
they are prisoners of war, the government can only try them for
enemy offenses in military courts martial, under long-established
rules of military law.
The judge's ruling could send the government scurrying just as
it begins to conduct the first commission sessions. Robertson
made his decision in the case of Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni
captured in Afghanistan in late 2001 and accused of being a
member of al Qaeda, but his opinion is expected to set the
standard in this court. Department of Justice lawyers were not
immediately available for comment, nor were attorneys who argued
on behalf of detainees in this specific case. Several were in
Cuba for commission preparations and other legal matters.
But another attorney representing several detainees who are
now challenging their imprisonment called Robertson's ruling a
major victory for the principle of fairness in U.S. courts.
"It's huge," said lawyer Brent Mickum. "I would like to think
this is the first step in the dismantling of the government's
Guantanamo edifice: the government has said it doesn't need to
provide anything more to the detainees, and the judge is saying
the government process afforded to detainees is legally
deficient."
|