Civil rights enforcement
falls in Bush term
Seattle Post
By EUNICE MOSCOSO
COX NEWS SERVICE
Monday, November 22, 2004
WASHINGTON -- The government's enforcement of civil rights
laws declined sharply during the Bush administration, according
to a study released yesterday.
Even though the level of complaints received by the Justice
Department has remained relatively constant, far fewer criminal
charges have been filed.
Federal prosecutors filed criminal charges against 159
defendants for violations of civil rights laws in 1999.
By 2003, the number had dropped to 84, according to the study
by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a non-partisan
research center at Syracuse University in New York.
The charges include abusive police tactics, racial violence,
slavery or involuntary servitude, and blocked access to
clinics.
During the same time, charges against terrorism suspects
increased dramatically and charges on weapons violations doubled.
In addition, federal charges on immigration violations increased
more than 28 percent, according to the study.
Civil rights groups said that the report was not
surprising.
"This confirms what everyone in the civil rights community has
known for the past four years, which is that President Bush's
Justice Department does not have a commitment to full enforcement
of the nation's civil rights laws," said Christopher Anders,
legislative counsel to the American Civil Liberties Union.
Anders also said that the Bush civil rights record is worse
than that of previous Republican presidents, including President
Reagan and the first President Bush.
Justice Department officials did not return several phone
calls for comment.
During his bid for re-election, Bush told the annual meeting
of the National Urban League, a non-profit that seeks economic
parity and civil rights for African Americans, that the
administration has vigorously enforced civil rights laws.
The statement was repeated various times by campaign
officials.
The Syracuse study also found that some of the decline in
pursuing civil rights cases has to do with prosecutorial
discretion.
In 2003, prosecutors filed formal charges in only 5 percent of
civil rights cases referred to them. By contrast, they chose to
pursue formal charges in 90 percent of referred immigration
cases.
The main reasons cited to not pursue the civil rights cases
included lack of evidence of criminal intent, no federal offense
evident, no known suspect and "declined per instructions from the
Department of Justice."
The study includes data from various sources, including
Justice Department files, annual reports to Congress, and
publications from U.S. courts.
Some of the material was obtained through the Freedom of
Information Act.
The study also found:
# The rate of civil rights complaints to the government has
stayed steady since 1999 at about 12,000 a year.
# Civil sanctions against civil rights violators have also
declined -- from 740 in 2001 to 576 in 2003. Civil suits can
involve voting rights violations, employment and housing
discrimination and other matters.
# The Justice Department's referrals for prosecution in civil
rights cases also dropped under the Bush administration -- from
3,053 in 1999 to 1,903 in 2003.
# From 1999 to 2003, the number of people charged by the
Justice Department with terrorism-related offenses increased from
99 to 899 and the number of people charged with weapons
violations more than doubled, from about 4,900 to more than
10,000.
In addition, the number of people charged with immigration
violations increased from 16,219 to 20,833 during the same time
period.
# Civil rights cases have always been rare. During the last
five years, the United States prosecuted more than 450,000 people
on various charges. Only a small fraction of those -- about one
in 1,000 -- were aimed at civil rights violators. By comparison,
about 600 of every 1,000 involved drugs, weapons and
immigration.
|