Bush's New Torture
Candidate
The New York Times
A Moveable Feast of Terrorism
By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: November 11, 2004
During the campaign, President Bush and Dick Cheney gave the
ominous impression that there was a dire threat that terrorists
could incinerate Americans at any time if that powder puff John
Kerry got anywhere near the Oval Office.
We felt the hot breath of the wolf pack bearing down on us.
But only a week later, the alarums have dimmed.
The administration lowered the terror threat in New York and
Washington yesterday, and the Capitol Hill police were
dismantling the elaborate security checkpoints they had put on
streets around the Capitol to thwart would-be bombers.
In his handwritten resignation letter, John Ashcroft reassured
Mr. Bush that "the objective of securing the safety of Americans
from crime and terror has been achieved."
Mission accomplished. Tell those wolves to scat, and let that
eagle soar, baby.
It was a tad surprising that Mr. Ashcroft would want to leave
just when he had a mandate to throw blue curtains over every
naked statue in town and hold Bible study for government
employees in a federal office. (He called his daily devotionals
at the Justice Department "RAMP": Read, Argue, Memorize and
Pray.)
The president is putting his own counsel, Alberto Gonzales,
who wrote the famous memo defending torture, in charge of our
civil liberties. Torture Guy, who blithely threw off 75 years of
international law and set the stage for the grotesque abuses at
Abu Ghraib and dubious detentions at Guantánamo, seems to
have a good grasp of what's just. No doubt we'll soon learn what
other protections, besides the Geneva Conventions and the
Constitution, Mr. Gonzales finds "quaint" and "obsolete."
With the F.B.I. investigating Halliburton and the second-term
scandal curse looming, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney want a dependable
ally - and former Enron attorney - at Justice. But since the
country is controlled by one party and the press has tended
toward the pusillanimous, cowed by the special prosecutor Patrick
Fitzgerald as he tries to throw reporters in jail, the White
House may be able to suppress any second-term problems.
Mr. Bush should quit fiddling around on the domestic side and
revamp his war council and national security team. The Bushies
can stop mentioning Osama's name and tell themselves that his
last, less militant video was a sign of weakness, but it's just
part of their dangerous denial. Osama bin Laden killed 3,000
innocents on 9/11; let's nail him.
Even as Karl Rove boasts that "moral values" swept his boss
back into the White House, it never seems to occur to the
president that it's immoral to endanger our troops in a war
shaped by the political clock, a war with no visible enemy, no
coherent plan and no exit timetable.
Falluja, supposed to be a defining battle, showed only how
undefined this guerrilla war is. The Marines swept into a city
deserted by most of the insurgents, who were terrorizing and
kidnapping Iraqis elsewhere.
"Falluja isn't Masada or the Alamo," Fred Kaplan wrote in
Slate, "some last-ditch outpost where the rebels whoop their
final battle cry, rally one more round of resistance, then pass
into history when their last rifleman falls."
Last night, the military said it dominated 70 percent of
Falluja. But what good does that do if 98 percent of the bad guys
have already moved on, or if 100 percent of the Sunnis boycott
the elections out of anger over the assault? It's just like when
Mr. Bush says 75 percent of Al Qaeda's leadership has been killed
or captured. What good is that if Al Qaeda has become an
inspirational force for 100 percent of the jihadists?
The math is self-defeating. Pictures of forces taking a
Falluja mosque will no doubt spur a surge of Islamic terrorist
recruits, who won't be fooled by the marines' new camouflage:
their Iraqi vanguard.
Just as there is talk here that John Kerry may want to run
again, there is also talk that Donald Rumsfeld wants to stay on
to continue his transformation of the military. Rummy's stubborn
need to show we could do more with less is what kept us from
having the strength to secure Iraq at the start, turning our
troops into targets for a ghostly foe armed with the explosives
and missiles looted by insurgents from unguarded caches.
The president should say to Rummy what the Democrats should
say to Mr. Kerry: "Thanks, you've done quite enough."
E-mail: liberties@nytimes.com
|