CIA Moves to Second Fiddle in
Intelligence Work
The Washington Post
By Dana Priest
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, February 27, 2005; Page A09
The nomination of John D. Negroponte as national
director of intelligence this month signaled the end of the CIA's
nearly 60-year run as the undisputed center of power and
influence in the secret world of intelligence.
From its Cold War heyday of spy-vs.-spy confrontation with the
Soviet Union, to its rebirth as the lead strike force against al
Qaeda's leadership, the CIA earned its standing not from its
size, budget or weapons systems, but from the sway its directors
held over presidents and the legend of its covert operations
overseas.
Today, as a result of a new law reorganizing the intelligence
community, the CIA no longer has primary standing among the 15
U.S. intelligence agencies. And its last director, cigar-chewing
George J. Tenet -- one in a line of larger-than-life leaders with
close ties to the Oval Office -- has been replaced by an
anti-Tenet figure, Porter J. Goss, a man of few words and low
profile who CIA employees say has yet to annunciate his vision
for the agency.
"It does appear the CIA will not occupy that same premier
position it had," said Peter Earnest, executive director of the
International Spy Museum and a former CIA spy. "It's the end of a
chapter."
The CIA has occupied the pinnacle in the intelligence world,
in part, because its chief held two titles: CIA director and the
broader director of central intelligence. The latter made him
responsible for managing efforts of not only the CIA but also the
intelligence offices in the Department of Defense and other parts
of the federal government. In recent years, it was the director
of central intelligence who briefed the president in the morning,
and in the afternoon, wearing his second hat as CIA director, he
sent spies on missions and executed covert operations.
"The face time," said Earnest, allowed the CIA director to
understand what the president was most interested in, "to hear
the president's own requirements. It was invaluable."
Now, Negroponte will oversee the CIA and 14 other agencies
that spend an estimated $40 billion a year on intelligence -- a
reorganization by Congress largely in response to recommendations
by the 9/11 commission, which said lack of coordination among
those offices played a role in the U.S. failure to thwart the
Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Not only will Negroponte replace the CIA director as the most
important voice the president hears on intelligence matters each
day, but other agencies, notably the Pentagon and the FBI, are
seeking to take over some of the CIA's traditional case officer
duties. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has tasked the
military to send highly classified units into the field to
collect human intelligence, using newly earned congressional
authority to recruit foreign agents when it is helpful.
The FBI wants to replace the CIA's role in recruiting
U.S.-based foreign officials to spy for the United States when
they return to their homes. It is also trying to mimic the CIA's
use of corporate contacts to gain information from overseas
business travelers.
With the President's Daily Briefing soon to be in Negroponte's
hands, intelligence officials said they expect dozens of CIA
analysts who produce it to move over to his office. So will the
National Intelligence Council, the nation's top intelligence
advisory panel, which produces National Intelligence Estimates as
well as analysis of long-term trends.
The CIA's science and technology branch may lose clout as
well, intelligence experts said. Already the major technological
capabilities -- namely satellite imagery and electronic espionage
-- reside outside the CIA. Experts say Negroponte's deputy-to-be,
Air Force Lt. Gen. Michael V. Hayden, wants to keep a major hand
in technological issues. Currently, Hayden heads the National
Security Agency, which manages electronic espionage.
Critics of the CIA's inability to gather more intelligence on
al Qaeda -- and of its high-profile, high-stakes failure to
accurately assess Iraq's weapons programs before the war -- say
these changes are long overdue.
"The CIA is no longer the favorite child, which will be good
for them," said one congressional official, who is not authorized
to be quoted by name. "They will have to play on a level playing
field. When you are in charge too long, you tend to ossify, then
get comfortable. They need to get uncomfortable."
But many CIA veterans, current and retired, say the agency's
diminished role comes at a vulnerable time for the institution.
Goss and his top aides, former Capitol Hill staffers who once
worked at the CIA, have still not settled nerves at the agency
after a round of high-profile personnel shuffles that left some
employees distrustful of the leadership that took over from Tenet
in September.
"One has to be concerned about the standing on the
CIA," said one senior CIA official with three decades of
experience. "I worry about the whole system. It's in risk of
losing its elan."
The new CIA, predicted CIA officials, will be more narrowly,
but intensely, focused on using U.S. spies and foreign agents to
collect enemy secrets.
In a recent executive order, Bush told Goss to increase the
number of U.S. spies by 50 percent over a period of years. Goss
gave his plans for achieving that goal to the president last
week. CIA officials declined to describe the plans, even in vague
terms, because they are classified.
Advocates of the reorganization say the new version of the CIA
will be able to focus on its core mission. Gathering human
intelligence "is simply going to be front and center," said Jamie
S. Gorelick, a member of the 9/11 commission, which recommended
the legislation. "They were trying to do too many things and
weren't doing them well."
But, Gorelick said, "I can understand why folks at the CIA are
despondent. They don't know what Goss wants them to do."
Some intelligence experts worry that the reorganization will
leave the CIA dangerously isolated from the heartbeat of U.S.
policymaking.
"You won't get the cross-fertilization, the healthy
interaction between the collectors and the analyzers that you
need to do intelligence work well," said Fred Hitz, a former CIA
inspector general.
"When you isolate yourself, you become detached from the
policy issues," a former head of the clandestine service said.
"You don't let the air in. The smaller the group that approves a
covert action, the greater the propensity for failure."
Even the CIA director's role in supervising human intelligence
might be challenged by the reorganization, several intelligence
officials said. They said Negroponte could decide to appoint his
own deputy for human intelligence who would decide whether the
CIA or another agency or department would be the most suited to a
specific spy operation.
"The CIA is a wounded gazelle on the African plain," said
another former senior intelligence official, lamenting the
encroachment by other agencies onto the CIA's traditional
territory. "It's a pile of bleached bones."
|