More British memos on prewar
concerns
MSNBC
By Andrea Mitchell
Correspondent
NBC News
Updated: 8:37 p.m. ET June 14, 2005
WASHINGTON — It started during British Prime Minister Tony Blair's
re-election campaign last month, when details leaked about a top-secret memo,
written in July 2002 — eight months before the Iraq war. In the memo,
British officials just back from Washington reported that prewar "intelligence
and facts were being fixed around the policy" to invade Iraq.
Just last week, both President George W. Bush and Blair vigorously denied
that war was inevitable.
"No, the facts were not being fixed, in any shape or form at
all,' said Blair at a White House news conference with the president on
June 7.
But now, war critics have come up with seven more memos, verified by NBC
News.
One, also from July 2002, says U.S. military planners had given "little
thought" to postwar Iraq.
"The memos are startlingly clear that the British saw that there was
inadequate planning, little planning for the aftermath,' says Sen. Carl
Levin, D-Mich., who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
And there's more. To prepare Blair for a meeting at the president's ranch in
April 2002, a year before the war, other British memos raised more
questions.
After a dinner with Bush's then-national security adviser Condoleezza
Rice, Blair's former national security adviser David Manning, now Britain's
ambassador to the U.S., wondered, "What happens on the morning
after' the war?
In yet another 2002 memo, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw asked,
"What will this action achieve? Can (there) be any certainty that the
replacement regime will be better? Iraq has had no history of
democracy.'
Rice, now U.S. secretary of state, told Chris Matthews on MSNBC-TV's
"Hardball,' "I would never claim that the exact nature of
this insurgency was understood at the time that we went to war.'
Vice President Dick Cheney also told a National Press Club luncheon Monday,
"Any suggestion that we did not exhaust all alternatives before we got to
that point, I think, is inaccurate.'
In fact, current and former diplomats tell NBC News they understood from the
beginning the Bush policy to be that Saddam had to be removed — one way
or the other. The only question was when and how.
© 2005 MSNBC Interactive
|