Lawyers for NBC News reporter Tim Russert suspected in the spring of 2004 that his testimony could snare Vice President Cheney's top aide, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, in a lie and Russert resisted testifying at the time about private conversations with Libby, according to court papers released yesterday.

Russert was aware that a special prosecutor probing the leak of a CIA operative's name knew of his summer 2003 telephone conversation with Libby, and that Libby had released him from any promise of confidentiality. But Russert, the Washington bureau chief for NBC News and host of "Meet the Press," and his attorneys argued in previously sealed court filings in June 2004 that he should not have to tell a grand jury about that conversation, because it would harm Russert's relationship with other sources.

On Woodward
Washington Post Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. discussed Bob Woodward's revelation that he may have been the first reporter told of Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA operative.

Background on the Plame Investigation

Russert ultimately testified under oath about the conversation after a federal judge ordered him to do so in July 2004. The information Russert provided became important evidence that Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald used to indict Libby in October on five felony counts of lying to the FBI and a grand jury, and of obstruction of justice.

Fitzgerald accused Libby of lying to investigators when he said he believed he heard about Valerie Plame's CIA role from Russert in their July 2003 telephone conversation. Russert testified that they never discussed Plame.

U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan released the court papers involving Russert yesterday. They were sought by the New York Times.

It "appears that Mr. Russert's testimony is sought solely because the Special Prosecutor believes that his recollection of a telephone conversation with an Executive Branch official is inconsistent with that official's statements," they wrote.

Commentary:
Not only is Russert a bad reporter (he sat on this massive scandal for years and forgot his duty is to the public and our trust) but he's a bad American. Most of us would jump at a chance to nail a known criminal. Not Tim Russert. His sources are more important to him than a news story or the facts.

Russert is also one of the pseudo reporters who pushed fake scandals during the Clinton years (and helped the GOP keep control of congress). He was also one of the strongest voices screaming about WMD that didn't never existed. Russert can't tell the difference between fact and opinion - his sources give him false stories and he runs with it, week after week, year after year. It's time for NBC gets rid of him.