"Dedicated to exposing the lies and impeachable offenses of George W. Bush"

Gore Says Bush Wiretapping Could be Impeachable Offense
ABC News
January 16, 2006

Jan. 16, 2006 — In an impassioned speech about President Bush's warrantless domestic wiretapping program, former Vice President Al Gore said in Washington, DC, on Monday that "the President of the United States has been breaking the law repeatedly and persistently."

Citing Bush Administration policies on torture, rendition and detentions, the winner of the 2000 popular vote said the President's "unlawful" eavesdropping program was part of a "larger pattern" of "seeming indifference to the Constitution."

Asked by ABC News following his speech whether President Bush's domestic spying program constituted an impeachable offense, Gore said it might be and pointed to one of the three Articles of Impeachment that the House Judiciary Committee approved against President Nixon on July 27, 1974.

"That's a legal determination for the Congress to make," Gore told ABC News. "But Article II of the impeachment charges against President Nixon was warrantless wiretapping that the President said was 'necessary' for national security."

"It can be" an impeachable offense, he added.

The domestic eavesdropping program authorized by President Bush following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, bypasses a special federal court whose approval is required under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Ever since the New York Times revealed the secret program last month, the Bush Administration has claimed that the circumvention of the FISA court was justified by arguing, in part, that Congress implicitly authorized the surveillance with the post-9/11 Authorization to Use Military Force.

Gore's speech drew fire from the president's party on Monday. Tracey Schmitt, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, issued a statement criticizing the former Vice President, stating Gore has an "incessant need to insert himself in the headline of the day" and has a "lack of understanding of the threats facing America."

But Gore is not alone in arguing that the warrantless eavesdropping authorized by President Bush conflicts with existing law and hinges on weak legal arguments. The non-partisan Congressional Research Service reached a similar conclusion earlier this month in a 41-page legal analysis.

While appearing on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" on Sunday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) said he, too, does not agree with the White House view that Congress effectively authorized the surveillance with its post-9/11 resolution.

A Bi-Partisan Problem

Sen. Specter and Gore part company, however, on the question of whether a president might possess special inherent powers as Commander-in-Chief that would make the National Security Agency domestic spying program permissible in wartime. Whereas Gore is confident that the president does not possess such power, Sen. Specter is hoping to explore the issue when the Senate Judiciary Committee holds hearings on the legality of the President's program next month.

In his Constitution Hall remarks on Monday, Gore did not confine his criticism to members of the other party. He criticized both Republican and Democratic members of the so-called "Gang of Eight" who were secretly briefed on the NSA program but did not take action to stop the President's "illegal activities."

"Though I sympathize with the awkward position in which these men and women were placed, I cannot disagree with the Liberty Coalition when it says that Democrats as well as Republicans in the Congress must share the blame for not taking action to protest and seek to prevent what they consider a grossly unconstitutional program," Gore said.

The Liberty Coalition is the "trans-partisan" civil liberties group that co-sponsored Gore's speech along with the American Constitution Society.

Supreme Court Criticism

In his Martin Luther King Day remarks, Gore also criticized President Bush for nominating Supreme Court Justices whom he believes will not serve as an adequate check on the executive.

"Whether you support his confirmation or not — and I do not — we must all agree that he will not vote as an effective check on the expansion of executive power," Gore said with respect to Judge Samuel Alito. "Likewise, Chief Justice Roberts has made plain his deference to the expansion of executive power through his support of judicial deference to executive agency rulemaking."

With regards to specific recommendations, Gore called upon congressional candidates to make the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate domestic eavesdropping an issue in the 2006 elections.

He also appealed for new whistleblower protections, comprehensive hearings in the House and Senate, and no renewal of the Patriot Act until adequate constitutional safeguards are added. He also wants telecommunications companies to "cease and desist" their "complicity" in this "apparently illegal invasion of the privacy of American citizens."

Gore's biggest standing ovation came when he said it was "simply an insult" to those who "came before us" to "imply that we have more to be fearful of than they."

In an effort to show that criticism of President Bush's spying program reaches across party lines, Gore was supposed to be introduced by ex-Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), a former House manager in the impeachment trial of then-President Bill Clinton. Since leaving Congress in 2003, Barr has emerged as an outspoken critic of the effect the Bush Administration's anti-terror policies are having on civil liberties.

The image of the odd bedfellows did not materialize, however, when Barr's satellite connection failed.

Teddy Davis is an ABC News field producer and co-author of The Note. He covers politics for the network's television, radio, and Internet platforms.

The conservative argument about inherent power is bogus because they say the constitution must be read exactly as it's written. There are no provisions in the Constitution allowing a president to violate laws at will, therefore Bush knowingly broke the law. On top of that Nixon was about to be impeached for doing what Bush has already admitted doing.

These same republicans argue there is no right to privacy in the constitution (and no right to an abortion), even though the constitution says our rights don't have to enumerated (the 9th Amendment). So, if all powers and all rights MUST be enumerated in the constitution, their previous arguments against abortion are now moot.

Besides, the Supreme Court just ruled that states have the power (and citizens have the right) to assisted suicide even though it's not in the constitution. The constitution clearly says the government only has the powers we give it, so the only remedy for Bush violating these powers (and giving himself new powers) is impeachment and removal from office.