No proof links Iraq,
al-Qaida, Powell says
MSNBC
Updated: 8:11 p.m. ET Jan. 08,
2004
WASHINGTON - Secretary of State Colin Powell reversed a year
of administration policy, acknowledging Thursday that he had seen
no "smoking gun [or] concrete evidence' of ties
between former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida.
Powell, speaking at a news conference at the State Department,
stressed that he was still certain that Iraq had dangerous
weapons and needed to be disarmed by force, and he sharply
disagreed with a private think tank report that maintained that
Iraq was not an imminent threat to the United States.
"I have not seen smoking gun, concrete evidence about
the connection, but I do believe the connections existed,'
he said.
Powell's observation marked a turning point in
administration arguments in support of the U.S. invasion of Iraq
last spring. The assertion that Saddam and the terrorist network
led by Saudi fugitive Osama bin Laden were working in concert was
a primary justification for the war.
As recently as September, President Bush declared that there
was "no question' that Saddam had ties to
al-Qaida.
Powell himself made the case most strongly in February, when
he urged the U.N. Security Council to back U.S. military action
in Iraq. "Iraqi officials deny accusations of ties with
al-Qaida,' Powell said then. "These denials are
simply not credible.'
Powell defended those comments Thursday, even as he cast doubt
on their conclusions. He said that at the time, he was referring
specifically to the presence of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in Baghdad
for medical treatments.
The United States has accused al-Zarqawi of being a close
associate of bin Laden's, but intelligence agencies in
France and other European countries that opposed the U.S. war
argued that al-Zarqawi was an independent operator.
"I'm confident of what I presented last year,'
Powell said. "The intelligence community is confident of
the material they gave me. I was representing them. It was
information they presented to the Congress. It was information
they had presented publicly, and they stand behind it. And this
game is still unfolding.'
Kay said to be quitting inspection team
Since the U.S. victory in Iraq, U.S. and U.N. teams have been
scrubbing the country for the chemical and biological weapons the
administration insisted the Baghdad government had been
hiding.
That effort, which has failed so far to find any such weapons,
could soon be severely hampered. Senior U.S. officials told NBC
News on Thursday that David Kay, head of the U.S.-led Iraq Survey
Group hunting for weapons, was planning to resign, without
issuing a final report.
‘I think Mr. Kay and his team have looked very hard. I
think the reason they haven't found it is it's
probably not there.'
— Charles Duelfer
Former deputy U.N. weapons inspection chairman
Kay's team, which has been scaled back since it began
work last year, has found illegal missiles but no stockpiles or
ongoing production of chemical or biological weapons, sources
told NBC's Andrea Mitchell. Only a rudimentary nuclear
program, which had not started, has been found, they said.
"I think Mr. Kay and his team have looked very hard. I
think the reason they haven't found it is it's
probably not there,' Charles Duelfer, former deputy
chairman of the U.N. weapons inspection agency, said in an
interview.
Report says policy misguided
Powell came under intense questioning at his news conference
Thursday about a new report from the Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, which accused the administration of
systematically misrepresenting the weapons threat from Iraq.
"It is unlikely that Iraq could have destroyed, hidden
or sent out of the country the hundreds of tons of chemical and
biological weapons, dozens of Scud missiles and facilities
engaged in the ongoing production of chemical and biological
weapons that officials claimed were present without the United
States detecting some sign of this activity,' said the
report, prepared by Carnegie President Jessica T. Mathews, Joseph
Cirincione and George Perkovich.
Powell responded that Saddam obviously had, and used,
destructive weapons in the late 1980s and then refused for a
decade to reassure the world that he had gotten rid of them.
"In terms of intention, he always had it,' Powell
said. Of Carnegie's finding that Iraq posed no imminent
threat, Powell said: "They did not say it wasn't
there.'
Years of U.N. inspections to determine whether Saddam was
harboring weapons of mass destruction were working well, the
report said, and the United States would be better advised to set
up a permanent system with the United Nations to guard against
the spread of dangerous technology.
NBC's Andrea Mitchell, MSNBC.com's Alex Johnson
and The Associated Press contributed to this report
© 2004 MSNBC.com
|