Cheney, Libby were informed uranium claim
was false
National Journal
By Murray Waas
February 3, 2006
Vice President Cheney and his then-Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby
were personally informed in June 2003 that the CIA no longer considered
credible the allegations that Saddam Hussein had attempted to procure uranium
from the African nation of Niger, according to government records and
interviews with current and former officials. The new CIA assessment came just
as Libby and other senior administration officials were embarking on an effort
to discredit an administration critic who had also been saying that the
allegations were untrue.
CIA analysts wrote then-CIA Director George Tenet in a highly classified
memo on June 17, 2003, "We no longer believe there is sufficient" credible
information to "conclude that Iraq pursued uranium from abroad." The memo was
titled: "In Response to Your Questions for Our Current Assessment and
Additional Details on Iraq's Alleged Pursuits of Uranium From Abroad."
Despite the CIA's findings, Libby attempted to discredit former Ambassador
Joseph Wilson, who had been sent on a CIA-sponsored mission to Niger the
previous year to investigate the claims, which he concluded were baseless.
Previous coverage of the CIA leak investigation from Murray Waas
The campaign against Wilson led to the outing of Wilson's wife, Valerie
Plame, as an undercover CIA officer -- less than a month after the CIA
assessment was completed. Libby resigned as Cheney's chief of staff and
national security adviser on October 28, 2005, after he was indicted by a
federal grand jury on five counts of making false statements, perjury, and
obstruction of justice for concealing his role in leaking Plame's identity to
the media.
Tenet requested the previously undisclosed intelligence assessment in large
part because of repeated inquiries from Cheney and Libby regarding the Niger
matter and Wilson's mission, although neither Cheney nor Libby specifically
asked that the new review be conducted, according to government records and to
current and former government officials. Tenet also asked for the assessment
because information about Wilson's mission to Niger had begun to appear in the
media, and Tenet thought that the press or Capitol Hill might raise additional
questions about the matter.
The new disclosures raise questions as to why Libby and other Bush
administration officials continued their efforts to discredit Wilson -- even as
they were told that claims about Iraq's having procured uranium from Niger were
most likely a hoax.
The answer may lie in part with the already well-known misgivings about the
CIA by Cheney, Libby, and other senior Bush administration officials. At one
point during that period -- the summer of 2003 -- Libby confronted a senior
intelligence analyst briefing him and the vice president and accused the CIA of
willfully misleading him and the administration on Niger. Libby was said to be
upset that the CIA, in his view, had routinely minimized the extent to which
Iraq was pursuing weapons of mass destruction and was now prematurely
attempting to distance itself from the Niger allegations.
Libby had also complained about the CIA's Center for Weapons Intelligence,
Nonproliferation, and Arms Control. WINPAC, as the center is known, scrutinizes
unconventional-weapons threats to the United States, including the pursuit by
both foreign nations and terrorist groups of nuclear, radiological, chemical,
and biological weapons.
Libby, according to people with knowledge of the events, said that he and
Cheney had come to believe that WINPAC was presenting Saddam Hussein's pursuit
of such weapons in a far more benign light than Iraq's intents and capabilities
reflected. Libby cited CIA bureaucratic inertia and caution and his view that
many of WINPAC's analysts were aligned with foreign-policy elites who did not
support the war with Iraq.
Libby and others in the office of the vice president apparently were even
more suspicious because they mistakenly believed that Plame worked for WINPAC,
according to these sources. When they also learned that Plame possibly played a
role in Wilson's selection for the Niger mission, their suspicions only
intensified.
One indication of Cheney's personal interest in the subject was that some of
Libby's earliest and most detailed information regarding Plame's CIA employment
came directly from the vice president, according to information contained in
Libby's grand jury indictment.
"On or about June 12, 2003," the indictment stated, "Libby was advised by
the Vice President of the United States that Wilson's wife worked at the
Central Intelligence Agency in the Counterproliferation Division. Libby
understood that the Vice President had learned this information from the
CIA."
It would not have been improper or illegal for Cheney to discuss Plame's CIA
employment with Libby or other government officials with high security
clearances. No public evidence has emerged during the two-year grand jury probe
by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald that Libby acted at the vice
president's behest in leaking details of Plame's CIA employment to the press,
or that Cheney even knew that Libby was doing so.
Contemporaneous notes of Libby's that were obtained by federal investigators
in the CIA leak case indicate that Cheney had originally learned about Plame
from then-CIA Director Tenet. Tenet has confirmed that Fitzgerald interviewed
him, but Tenet has refused to make public any details of what he told
investigators. He declined to comment for this story.
Sources said that Tenet may have discussed Plame with Cheney because of
requests from Cheney, Libby, and other administration officials for more
information about the Niger matter and Wilson's mission. Cheney's and Libby's
interest in Niger was apparently rekindled after New York Times columnist
Nicholas D. Kristof wrote on May 6, 2003, that the CIA had sent an unnamed
former ambassador to the African nation in February 2002 to investigate
allegations that Iraq had attempted to purchase uranium from Niger. Kristof
wrote that the ex-ambassador reported back to the CIA and the State Department
that the allegations were "unequivocally wrong" and "based on forged
documents."
The column led Cheney and Libby to inquire about the then-still-unnamed
ambassador and his trip to Niger. On May 29, 2003, Libby asked
then-Undersecretary of State Marc Grossman for information about the mission.
Grossman in turn assigned the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and
Research to prepare a report on the matter. Cheney's and Libby's interest in
the issue led Tenet to seek more information as well.
On June 11 or 12, according to the grand jury indictment of Libby, Grossman
reported back that "in sum and substance Wilson's wife worked at the CIA, and
the State Department personnel were saying that Wilson's wife was involved in
the planning of his trip."
Also on June 11, 2003, according to the indictment, "Libby spoke with a
senior officer of the CIA to ask about the origin and circumstances of Wilson's
trip, and was advised by the CIA officer that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA
and was believed to be responsible for sending Wilson on the trip." On the very
next day, June 12, the indictment said, Cheney more specifically informed Libby
that Plame worked at the CIA's "Counterproliferation Division."
Tenet received the highly classified memo on Niger from his analysts on June
17, 2003, five days after Cheney and Libby spoke with each other about Plame's
working for the CIA. Sources familiar with the matter say that both Cheney and
Libby were informed of the findings in the June 17 memo only days after Tenet
himself read and reviewed it.
In the memo, the CIA analysts wrote: "Since learning that the Iraqi-Niger
uranium deal was based on false documents earlier this spring, we no longer
believe that there is sufficient other reporting to conclude that Iraq
purchased uranium from abroad."
The memo also related that there had been other, earlier claims that
Saddam's regime had attempted to purchase uranium from private interests in
Somalia and Benin; these claims predated the Niger allegations. It was that
past intelligence that had led CIA analysts, in part, to consider the Niger
claims as plausible.
But the memo said that after a thorough review of those earlier reports, the
CIA had concluded that they were no longer credible. Indeed, the previous
intelligence reports citing those claims had long since been "recalled" --
meaning that the CIA had formally repudiated them.
The memo's findings were considered so significant that they were not only
quickly shared with Cheney and Libby but also with Congress, albeit on a
classified basis, according to government records and interviews.
On June 18, 2003, the day after the new Niger assessment was sent to Tenet,
Robert D. Walpole, the national intelligence officer for strategic and nuclear
programs, briefed members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
regarding the findings. And on the following day, June 19, 2003, Walpole
briefed members of the House Select Committee on Intelligence as well.
Six days after the memo was sent to Tenet, on June 23, 2003, Libby met with
then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller and -- as part of an effort to
discredit Wilson -- passed along to her what prosecutors have said was
classified information that Wilson's wife, Plame, worked for the CIA, according
to allegations contained in Libby's indictment.
On July 6, 2003, Wilson himself went public with his allegations that the
Bush administration had misused the Niger claims to make the case to go to war.
Wilson made his arguments in an op-ed in The New York Times and an appearance
that same morning on NBC's Meet the Press.
On July 8, 2003, Libby and Miller met again. During a two-hour breakfast at
the St. Regis Hotel in Washington, according to testimony Miller gave to the
federal grand jury hearing evidence in the CIA leak case, Libby first told her
that Plame worked for the CIA's Weapons, Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and
Arms Control Office.
Around the same time, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove and at
least one other senior Bush administration official leaked information to a
number of journalists about Plame's CIA employment and her role in recommending
her husband for the Niger mission.
Columnist Robert Novak, on July 14, 2003, published his now-famous column
identifying Plame as a CIA "operative" and alleging that she had been
responsible for sending her husband to Niger.
The disclosure did little to discredit Wilson. Instead, it had unintended
and unforeseen consequences for Libby and the Bush administration: A special
prosecutor would be named to investigate the leak; Judith Miller would spend 85
days in jail for refusing to testify regarding her conversations with Libby
before ultimately relenting; and a federal grand jury would indict Libby on
charges that he obstructed justice and committed perjury to conceal his own
role in the leak of Plame's CIA status to the press.
As Libby awaits trial, one of the unresolved mysteries is why Libby insisted
in interviews with the FBI and during his grand jury testimony that he learned
about Plame's employment from journalists, when investigators already had
Libby's own copious notes indicating that he had first learned many of the
details of Plame's CIA employment from Cheney and other senior government
officials.
One possibility examined by investigators is that Libby was attempting to
cover for Cheney because of the political or legal fallout that might occur if
it was determined that the vice president had been involved in the effort to
discredit Wilson.
Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University, said, "The
prosecutor's implicit inference before the jury may well likely be that Libby
lied to protect the vice president. Even in a plain vanilla case, a prosecutor
always wants to be able to demonstrate a motive."
That Cheney was one of the first people to tell Libby about Plame, and that
Libby had written in his notes that Cheney had heard the information from the
CIA director, Gillers said, might make it more difficult for Libby to mount a
credible defense of a faulty memory. "From a prosecutor's point of view, and
perhaps a jury's as well, the conversation [during which Libby learned about
Plame] is the more dramatic and the more memorable because the conversation was
with the vice president" and because the CIA director's name also came up,
Gillers said.
The disclosure that Cheney and Libby were told of a CIA assessment that the
agency considered the Niger allegations to be untrue, and that Tenet requested
the assessment as a result of the personal interest of Cheney and Libby, would
"demonstrate even further that Niger was a central issue for Libby," said
Gillers, and would "make it even harder, although not impossible, to claim a
faulty memory."
-- Murray Waas is a Washington-based journalist.
|