Republicans Hit Hard
Over Social Security Plan
NY Times
Republicans Are Chastened About Social Security Plan
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and ROBIN TONER
Published: February 27, 2005
WASHINGTON, Feb. 26 - After a bruising weeklong recess,
Congressional Republicans will return to work on Monday chastened
by public skepticism over President Bush's plan for private
accounts in Social Security. One leading Republican, Senator Rick
Santorum of Pennsylvania, acknowledged that the opposition was
better organized while another, Senator Charles E. Grassley of
Iowa, said bipartisan compromise was unlikely unless the
president can change the public mood.
"It's a heavy lift," Mr. Grassley, the chairman of the Senate
Finance Committee, said Friday, after a week spent crisscrossing
his home state to play host to 17 town-hall-style meetings. He
said the sessions ended "without my getting much of a consensus
of where people are, except general confusion," and with the
president still facing "a major job of educating people."
The story was much the same throughout the country, as
Republicans - some already skittish over Mr. Bush's plan - spent
the week trying to assuage nervous constituents. Instead of
building support for Mr. Bush's proposal to allow younger workers
to divert payroll taxes into private retirement accounts, some of
the events turned into fractious gripe sessions and others did
not go nearly as well as their hosts had hoped.
Those listening sessions also forced Republicans to confront
another reality: opposition to the spending cuts outlined in Mr.
Bush's 2006 budget. The $2.57 trillion budget will dominate the
Congressional agenda for the next three weeks. But instead of
fighting Democrats, Republicans - many of whom campaigned on
slashing spending and cutting the federal deficit - are at odds
with themselves over which programs to cut and which to
spare.
Mr. Grassley, whose position as Senate finance chairman makes
him the linchpin of any Social Security deal, said he still
intended to negotiate a compromise between Democrats and
Republicans. But he warned that lawmakers would not act unless
there was pressure from voters, and he said voters would not put
pressure on Congress unless the president persuaded them that
private accounts are necessary.
"I think 90 percent of the lifting is with the president," he
said. Mr. Grassley said, when asked if he was reaching out to
Democrats, "That process is starting, but it's starting very slow
because too many Republicans and Democrats - how would you say
it? - don't have the confidence that this issue is ever going to
come up."
Mr. Santorum complained that he was dogged all week by
opponents of the White House plan who dominated news coverage.
Mr. Santorum, who is the third-ranking Republican in the Senate
leadership and chairman of the subcommittee on Social Security,
was heckled by college students - the very audience the Bush
administration was counting on - and peppered with questions from
retirees.
"Clearly the other side is better organized," Mr. Santorum
said. "They got people to all these events. They had seniors
lined up to ask questions, they had staff people running up
passing them notes."
Even so, Mr. Santorum described himself as encouraged at the
level of interest; both he and Mr. Grassley said it was far too
early to predict the outcome.
Senior Republican Congressional aides said the tone of the
response was not unexpected, particularly given traditional
nervousness among older Americans about potential changes in
Social Security. They said that lawmakers would sort through the
reactions when they gathered on Capitol Hill this week, and that
the meetings back home would no doubt color how Republicans
proceeded.
"It is going to be those personal experiences they had out on
the road that will shape their views," said Bob Stevenson, a
spokesman for Senator Bill Frist, the majority leader.
Mr. Bush, meanwhile, speaking in his radio address on
Saturday, declared himself pleased with how the recess week
went.
"I am pleased with the progress of the national discussion on
this issue, and I look forward to hearing everyone's ideas when
the Congress returns," Mr. Bush said. He added, "Some in
Washington want to deny that Social Security has a problem, but
the American people know better and you have the power to
determine the outcome of this debate."
AARP, the powerful retirees' organization that opposes private
accounts financed by payroll taxes, has been tracking the
meetings, and offered a different assessment.
"We've yet to find one where there was an enthusiastic
reception," said John Rother, the group's policy director. "The
most positive reception people are getting is lots of questions,
and there's significant skepticism. This is proving to be a tough
sell, and our polling suggests that the more people know, the
harder the sell."
Mr. Grassley acknowledged that the Social Security plan stood
in stark contrast to the last major piece of social welfare
legislation that moved through his committee: a bill overhauling
Medicare and creating a prescription drug benefit. "A good share
of both parties felt that something needed to be done on
Medicare," he said, "and so there was impetus in both parties to
at least look at it." But on Social Security, he said, "there's
too much of a feeling that it's better to wait a while before you
do something."
Democrats, many of whom held their own constituent meetings,
were practically giddy at the Republicans' dilemma.
"The reviews are in: Santorum's Social Security roadshow was a
bust," crowed the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee on
Friday, in a headline that topped a list of excerpts from news
accounts.
"They have run into a real hornet's nest," said Brendan Daly,
spokesman for Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the
House Democratic leader. Mr. Daly said Democrats planned events
for next week to keep the focus on Social Security.
The fallout from the recess might deepen the division between
the parties on Capitol Hill. Democrats have insisted that they
will be united in their opposition to the Bush plan, and on
Friday, Senator Jon Corzine, the New Jersey Democrat who is
running for governor of that state, said he expected that feeling
to intensify.
"I can't imagine that people are going to come back more
fearful that there is sort of a drumbeat of support for the
private account concept," Mr. Corzine said. He held three
constituent meetings devoted to Social Security, he said,
including two featuring representatives of AARP.
"It is clearly something that seniors are rejecting in very,
very large numbers," Mr. Corzine said, "and increasingly it feels
to me that even folks moving down the age spectrum are turning
against it."
At least one Republican, Representative Shelley Moore Capito
of West Virginia, said she would urge colleagues to "be really
cautious about what we do." Ms. Capito, whose district includes a
substantial population of older people and who has not taken a
position on private accounts, said the response from constituents
was "probably more negative than positive."
Like a number of other Republicans, Ms. Capito said she heard
repeatedly from voters who were worried about Mr. Bush's budget,
which would substantially cut or eliminate 150 federal
programs.
Another Republican, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, said he
heard so many complaints about cutbacks for vocational training
grants that he has decided to oppose Mr. Bush on that issue.
"Some of the programs that the president has eliminated may not
be possible," he said.
Congress has failed to adopt a budget resolution for two of
the last three years; a failure to do so this year, when Mr. Bush
has made fiscal restraint a high priority, would be an
embarrassment to the White House and a defeat for the Republican
leadership in Congress. The chairman of the Senate Budget
Committee, Senator Judd Gregg, said meeting the president's
spending goals would be a challenge.
"Even though they may talk a fiscally conservative game, in
the end, when they are asked to vote, they would rather not have
to vote for something that will actually be real," he said.
Campaign Against AARP
By The New York Times
WASHINGTON, Feb. 26 - USA Next, a conservative group that is
supporting President Bush's plan to revamp Social Security with a
campaign criticizing AARP, will send a letter to as many as 500
conservative activists this week signaling future lines of
attack, officials at USA Next said.
The group, which was criticized last week when it tested an
advertisement linking AARP to support for same-sex marriage, said
it planned to attack AARP on other positions. "What the liberals
cannot hide is the shameful record of liberal activism AARP has
compiled over the years," a draft of the letter says.
Officials at AARP say the group is nonpartisan and has never
taken a position on same-sex marriage.
Carl Hulsecontributed reporting for this article.
|