Oil executives caught lying to
Congress
Seattle Times/AP
Oil executives clarify task-force contacts
H. Josef Hebert
December 1, 2005
WASHINGTON — Five oil-industry executives acknowledged frequent
company contacts with government officials to discuss energy issues but
insisted that they had responded truthfully at a recent Senate hearing when
they denied participating in Vice President Dick Cheney's 2001 energy task
force.
The exchange at the Nov. 9 hearing prompted accusations by some Democratic
senators that several of the executives may have knowingly misled Congress. A
report published a few days later found that White House logs showed
representatives of some of the companies had visited officials of the energy
task force.
New Mexico Sens. Pete Domenici, chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, and Jeff Bingaman, its ranking Democrat, asked the executives to
clarify any discrepancies. The senators released the executives' written
responses on Wednesday.
John Hofmeister, chairman of Shell Oil, said Shell representatives did not
meet with the task force but added, "Shell representatives did meet with the
administration, including the vice president and his staff, on a broad range of
energy-policy issues."
Exxon Mobil said its chairman, Lee Raymond, responded accurately when he
said no one at the company participated in a task-force meeting — as the
question was phrased by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.
In its letter, however, Exxon Mobil confirmed that company officials met
with a Bush administration official for 45 minutes on Feb. 14, 2001, to discuss
the "global energy supply and demand situation." On the same day, the company
said, the same information was given to members of Congress and others. The
Cheney task force issued its report on energy priorities in May 2001.
Lautenberg called the executives' clarifications "corporate doublespeak that
only further demonstrates the need for a criminal investigation" of their Nov.
9 testimony.
There was no indication that either Domenici or Bingaman planned to press
matters further. The White House has steadfastly refused to provide a list of
oil companies that provided information to the Cheney task force, going to
court to fight attempts to obtain such information.
Ross Pillari, chairman of BP America, said on Nov. 9 that he did not know
whether anyone from his company participated in any task-force matters.
In his clarification, Pillari reiterated that he was "not personally
involved in energy policy issues" in 2001. After looking into the issue
further, he confirmed that "BP representatives did meet with (task-force) staff
members."
advertising
They "provided them with comments on a range of energy policy matters ... much
like we continue to do on a routine basis with members of Congress and the
administration," Pillari wrote.
James Mulva, chairman of ConocoPhillips, also insisted that he had responded
accurately when he said his company did not participate in the Cheney task
force. Mulva said he since had learned that Archie Dunham, chairman of Conoco,
and another Conoco official "had attended or participated in a task force
meeting in 2001."
David O'Reilly, chairman of Chevron, wrote that Chevron representatives "did
not attend any meetings with administration officials or staff for the purpose
of discussing (Cheney) task force activities." But O'Reilly attached to his
reply a letter he sent to President Bush on Feb. 5, 2001, emphasizing "we need
to increase our energy supply" and discussing other energy issues.
"Chevron personnel routinely have and did have discussions on U.S. energy
policy with officials in the administration and their staff," O'Reilly wrote in
his response to Domenici and Bingaman.
Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company
|