Control of Senate may hinge on
Lott
Sun Times
Bob Novak
December 26, 2005
Trent Lott within the next week plans to decide between seeking a fourth
term in the U.S. Senate from Mississippi or retiring from public life. That
could determine whether Republicans keep control of the Senate in next year's
elections. For the longer range, Lott's retirement and replacement could signal
that Southern political realignment has peaked and now is receding.
Mississippi, one of the reddest of the red Republican states, has not even
been on the game board of the Washington analysis forecasting the 2006 Senate
outcome. But in Mississippi, prominent Republicans are worried sick. They
believe Lott will probably retire. If so, they expect the new senator will be a
Democrat, former state Attorney General Mike Moore. Republican politicians in
Mississippi believe Rep. Chip Pickering, the likely Republican nominee if Lott
does not run, cannot defeat Moore.
Republican National Chairman Ken Mehlman pleaded with Lott last week to run
again. The senator was as blunt with this emissary from President Bush as he
was with me. "Where is our vision and our agenda?" he asked. The malaise
afflicting the Bush administration not only threatens a Senate seat in
Mississippi but impacts Lott's decision whether to retire.
A Bush entreaty now to Lott is ironic. Lott was driven out of the Senate
majority leader's chair after the 2002 elections when the president refused to
defend him from calumnies that a harmless jocular remark on the late Strom
Thurmond's 100th birthday was racist in nature. Lott's recently published
memoir, Herding Cats, reveals he was deeply hurt by Bush's nonsupport.
Republicans pressing Lott to run say that if he retires, he will have to
live the rest of his life under the burden of giving the Democrats a Senate
seat and perhaps control of the Senate out of personal pique that he no longer
was majority leader. But Lott has not been sulking in his tents for three
years. He has been an active presence on the Senate floor and has made the most
of his meager power base as Senate Rules Committee chairman.
When Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison last week urged Lott to stay, he reminded her
that she, too, had pondered before deciding to run again in Texas next year. He
said a six-year Senate term poses a major undertaking, adding that he
considered not running for his third term in 2000 when he was still majority
leader. His personal financial condition has deteriorated since then, with the
loss of half of his net worth when Hurricane Katrina swept away his home at
Pascagoula, Miss.
"The hurricane is what has made this decision difficult for me," Lott told
me. On the one hand, "the performance by the administration has been poor and
the Congress has not been a lot better." On the other hand, "my people need all
the help I can give them." Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour has pointed to Lott's
role in guiding the Katrina tax relief package through the Senate, declaring:
"This shows why Mississippi and the country need Trent Lott to be re-elected
next year."
Lott wonders what his senatorial role would be beginning his fourth term at
age 65 without a leadership position or significant committee chairmanship.
Sen. John McCain has urged Lott to return as leader of Senate Republicans
(succeeding Bill Frist, who is leaving the Senate). But that would require an
aggressive campaign against Majority Whip Mitch McConnell that Lott is not
inclined to pursue.
Mississippi Republicans are so anxious about a Lott-less election next year
partly because Democrat Moore is a better-known, more-appealing figure in the
state than Republican Pickering. The state's big African-American minority
continues to increase, and politically potent trial lawyers will be
unrestrained on behalf of Moore. Finally, the performance by the
Republican-controlled national government in coping with Katrina is no asset
for Republican candidates in Mississippi.
When George W. stood aside while Trent Lott was tossed out, I wrote on Dec.
23, 2002, that the secret liberal theme behind his defenestration was that "the
GOP's Southern base, the bedrock of its national election victories, is an
illegitimate legacy from racist Dixiecrats." Now, three years later, that
bedrock may be eroding.
|