|
AP ignored Bush's flip-flop on Patriot
Act
Media Matters
AP ignored Bush's prior opposition to Patriot Act short-term extension
December 23, 2005
Summary: An Associated Press article on the temporary five-week extension of
the USA Patriot Act failed to note that the White House had indicated that
President Bush supported only a permanent extension of the act and would not
sign "any short-term renewal."
A December 23 Associated Press article by Laurie Kellman on Congress'
passage of a five-week extension of the USA Patriot Act noted that President
Bush had "repeatedly urged Congress not to let" the act expire and "indicated
that he would sign the extension." But the article failed to note that the
White House, less than a week earlier, had indicated that Bush supported only a
permanent extension of the act and had no interest in signing "any short-term
renewal."
In a December 16 press briefing, White House press secretary Scott McClellan
suggested that Bush would veto a short-term extension of the Patriot Act,
stating that Bush was "not interested in signing" such a proposal:
McCLELLAN: The President has made it very clear that he is not interested in
signing any short-term renewal. The terrorist threats will not expire at the
end of this year. They won't expire in three months. We need to move forward
and pass this critical legislation.
In a December 21 press briefing, McClellan stood by these comments.
Moreover, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) and Sen. Arlen Specter
(R-PA), both supporters of making the Patriot Act permanent, asserted in recent
days (here and here) that Bush would not sign any short-term extension.
On December 22, however, the White House announced that Bush would, in fact,
sign the five-week extension approved that day by the House and accepted by the
Senate in a compromise. (Earlier in the week, the Senate had voted to extend
the Patriot Act by six months.) A December 23 Washington Post article by
Jonathan Weisman reported that the "House action was a setback for Bush, who
had repeatedly said he would not accept a 'short-term extension.' " A Reuters
report by Donna Smith noted that Bush "had objected to any temporary extension
of current law;" and a December 23 New York Times article by Sheryl Gay
Stolberg reported that "the deal fell far short of President Bush's aim of
permanently extending the original law."
But while the AP article acknowledged that Congress' approval of the
five-week extension represented "a turnabout for GOP leaders who had long
insisted they would accept nothing less than a permanent renewal of the law,"
it failed to explicitly note Bush's clear "turnabout" on the issue.
|