Army Contract Official Critical of
Halliburton Pact Is Demoted
NY Times
By ERIK ECKHOLM
Published: August 29, 2005
A top Army contracting official who criticized a large, noncompetitive
contract with the Halliburton Company for work in Iraq was demoted Saturday for
what the Army called poor job performance.
The official, Bunnatine H. Greenhouse, has worked in military procurement
for 20 years and for the past several years had been the chief overseer of
contracts at the Army Corps of Engineers, the agency that has managed much of
the reconstruction work in Iraq.
The demotion removes her from the elite Senior Executive Service and
reassigns her to a lesser job in the corps' civil works division.
Ms. Greenhouse's lawyer, Michael Kohn, called the action an "obvious
reprisal" for the strong objections she raised in 2003 to a series of corps
decisions involving the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root, which
has garnered more than $10 billion for work in Iraq.
Dick Cheney led Halliburton, which is based in Texas, before he became vice
president.
"She is being demoted because of her strict adherence to procurement
requirements and the Army's preference to sidestep them when it suits their
needs," Mr. Kohn said Sunday in an interview. He also said the Army had
violated a commitment to delay Ms. Greenhouse's dismissal until the completion
of an inquiry by the Pentagon's inspector general.
Carol Sanders, spokeswoman for the Army Corps of Engineers, said Sunday that
the personnel action against Ms. Greenhouse had been approved by the Department
of the Army. And in a memorandum dated June 3, 2005, as the demotion was being
arranged, the commander of the corps, Lt. Gen. Carl A. Strock, said the
administrative record "clearly demonstrates that Ms. Greenhouse's removal from
the S.E.S. is based on her performance and not in retaliation for any
disclosures of alleged improprieties that she may have made."
Known as a stickler for the rules on competition, Ms. Greenhouse initially
received stellar performance ratings, Mr. Kohn said. But her reviews became
negative at roughly the time she began objecting to decisions she saw as
improperly favoring Kellogg Brown & Root, he said. Often she hand-wrote her
concerns on the contract documents, a practice that corps leaders called
unprofessional and confusing.
In October 2004, General Strock, citing two consecutive performance reviews
that called Ms. Greenhouse an uncooperative manager, informed her that she
would be demoted.
Ms. Greenhouse fought the demotion through official channels, and publicly
described her clashes with Corps of Engineers leaders over a five-year, $7
billion oil-repair contract awarded to Kellogg Brown & Root. She had argued
that if urgency required a no-bid contract, its duration should be brief.
Ms. Greenhouse had also fought the granting of a waiver to Kellogg Brown
& Root in December 2003, approving the high prices it had paid for fuel
imports for Iraq, and had objected to extending its five-year contract for
logistical support in the Balkans for 11 months and $165 million without
competitive bidding. In late June, ignoring warnings from her superiors, Ms.
Greenhouse appeared before a Congressional panel, calling the Kellogg Brown
& Root oil contract "the most blatant and improper contract abuse I have
witnessed during the course of my professional career." She also said the
defense secretary's office had improperly interfered in the awarding of the
contract.
Her demotion was delayed when the Army's senior legal officials said they
would first seek an independent investigation of her reprisal complaint. "The
Army has referred this matter to the Department of Defense inspector general
for their review and action, as appropriate," said an Oct. 22, 2004, letter to
Ms. Greenhouse's lawyer from Robert M. Fano, the Army's chief of civilian
personnel law. The acting secretary of the Army, Mr. Fano wrote, had also
directed the Corps of Engineers to "suspend any adverse personnel action so
that Ms. Greenhouse remains in her current position until a sufficient record
is available to address the specific matters you raised."
But on July 14, the Army secretary approved Ms. Greenhouse's demotion,
effective Aug. 27. With his request to proceed, General Strock had provided an
unsigned nine-page memorandum, reviewing Ms. Greenhouse's recent performance
ratings and responding to her allegations of impropriety.
Mr. Kohn said Sunday that the inspector general had not finished
investigating the matter and that the demotion violated the Army secretary's
commitment to wait on any action.
Mr. Kohn said that when he telephoned Dan Meyer, director of civilian
reprisal investigations in the inspector general's office, on Aug. 24, Mr.
Meyer was "shocked" to learn that the corps had proceeded against Ms.
Greenhouse. Mr. Meyer said that he was immediately opening a "civilian
reprisal" investigation and faxed forms to Mr. Kohn to initiate the process,
Mr. Kohn said.
A Pentagon spokesman said Sunday that the inspector general's office could
not be reached for comment.
For more on Greenhouse check out whistle-blower seeks
protection
In a letter to Greenhouse's lawyer, an Army attorney said that the
matter is being referred to the Defense Department's inspector general for
"review and action, as appropriate." It also said the Corps had been ordered to
"suspend any adverse personnel action" against Greenhouse "until a sufficient
record is available to address the specific matters" in her
complaint.
|