"Dedicated to exposing the lies and impeachable offenses of George W. Bush"


Bush Trust in Cheney, Rove Tested as Public Confidence Declines
Bloomberg
Kristin Jensen and Richard Keil
November 21, 2005

 Nov. 21 (Bloomberg) -- In the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, Americans rallied behind President George W. Bush, who had stood atop the rubble of the Twin Towers in New York vowing to hunt down those responsible for the worst terrorist act in U.S. history. Bush's approval rating soared as he took just 26 days to go to war against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Four years later, after winning re-election by 3 million votes, it's a different world for the president. His popularity is at a record low as a scandal shakes the White House, the deaths mount in Iraq and his response to everything from hurricanes to surging gasoline prices is being challenged by Republicans and Democrats alike.

The backlash stems in part from an insular style that has defined Bush's five years in the White House -- an approach that can both lead to resolute action and leave the president with few allies, historians and lawmakers say. A band of trusted officials crafts far-reaching policies on issues ranging from the invasion of Iraq to the overhaul of Social Security, and Bush goes with his gut, driven by moral certitude, they say.

"Certainly we want a man of resolve," says Stanley Kutler, a historian who in 1992 sued to obtain access to tapes from President Richard Nixon's administration to write the book "Abuse of Power" (Free Press, 1997). "But there is a time, too, where a man has to say, `No, wait a minute. Let me sit down with you guys, and let's see where we go."'

Bush, 59, cares deeply about some issues such as tax cuts and the war on terrorism, former administration officials say. He relies on advisers, mainly Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, to lead the way on the rest.

Far Less Analysis

There is far less analysis than during the presidencies of Gerald Ford, Nixon or Bush's father, says Richard Clarke, the former White House counterterrorism chief.

"In the first Bush administration -- George H.W. Bush -- and in the Ford administration and Nixon administration, there were analytical papers written on major decisions," says Clarke, 55, a former special adviser to Bush who clashed with the administration. "That doesn't go on very much now. The inner tribe comes to the conclusion of where they want to go, and then the staff work that is done is justifying it."

Bush's response to the Sept. 11 attacks sent his approval rating climbing to 90 percent in a Gallup Organization poll later that month. He parlayed that popularity into a series of legislative victories.

Helped by Rove, 54, the president co-opted traditional Democratic issues such as education and health care, making good on campaign promises to pass a law setting standards for schools and adding a prescription drug benefit to Medicare.

$1.85 Trillion in Tax Cuts {correction: $1.85 trillion of debt):

He got Congress sto pass tax cuts totaling $1.85 trillion, won limits on class-action lawsuits and signed into law a measure with sharp increases in highway funds, much of which goes to industry. Business leaders credit the president, who earned a master of business administration degree from Harvard University, for an economy that increased at an average of 3.8 percent in the third quarter of 2005, above the average quarterly rate in the past 20 years of 3.1 percent.

"The president is a good manager," House Majority Leader Roy Blunt says. "He's the first MBA to ever be president, and I think that shows in his management style."

Contrary to the charges of critics, Blunt says, Bush often consults lawmakers. "He insists on a broad range of information," Blunt, 55, says.

Rove Distraction

The most immediate challenge for Bush's second term is the Oct. 28 indictment of Cheney's top aide, I. Lewis Libby, on obstruction of justice charges. A cloud still hangs over Rove in that case as well, and the distraction may hinder Bush's chances of pursuing ambitious goals for a second term, including rewriting the tax code.

The president must also overcome the concerns of fiscal conservatives who have long dominated the Republican Party. In 2002, he signed legislation creating the Department of Homeland Security -- the biggest reorganization of the federal government in a half-century -- despite his misgivings about the vast expansion of the bureaucracy.

Bush hasn't vetoed a single bill in five years and has proposed such potential budget-busting programs as the establishment of private investment accounts in Social Security and the prescription drug benefit.

The government, which recorded budget surpluses from fiscal 1998 to fiscal 2001, reported a $413 billion deficit in the year ended on Sept. 30, 2004. While the deficit has been shrinking during 2005 as tax revenue has surged, Bush's tax cuts, the Medicare legislation and spending on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars may lead to record deficits in coming years, economists say.

Weapons of Mass Destruction

Yet Bush's presidency may be defined by his boldest decisions -- invading Afghanistan and Iraq.

The move to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003 initially enjoyed broad support among Americans and in Congress as Bush, former Secretary of State Colin Powell and then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice made the public case that the Iraqi leader possessed weapons of mass destruction.

The decision to invade emerged, once again, from a small group of trusted advisers, Clarke says. Bush's father had failed to depose Hussein during the first Gulf War.

Cheney, who had worked for the elder Bush, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld returned to the White House with a plan to take on Iraq again, long before the terrorist attacks, Clarke says.

`Preconceived Plans'

"They were talking about Iraq on the evening of 9/11," Clarke says. "I remember Rumsfeld saying, `Yeah, well, we can invade Afghanistan, but that's not enough. There's not enough targets in Afghanistan.' They wanted to use 9/11 as an excuse to implement their preconceived plans to invade Iraq."

To his admirers, Bush is a man who cares about principles, not backroom deals. During a visit to Russia in 2002, he told a group of students: "In order to lead, you've got to know what you believe. You have to stand on principle. You have to believe in certain values, and you must defend them at all costs."

Bush describes the world in both moralistic and personal terms that are sometimes extraordinary for a world leader: Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, is an evil, stone-cold killer; Russian President Vladimir Putin is someone Americans can trust.

"I looked the man in the eye," Bush said of Putin in June 2001. "I was able to get a sense of his soul."

In April 2002, he called Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon "a man of peace," incensing Arab leaders.

`Compassionate Conservative'

When asked a week later after a meeting with then Crown Prince Abdullah whether the Saudi monarch had objected, Bush said he and the Arab leader had "established a strong personal bond," adding, "We spent a lot of time alone, discussing our respective visions, talking about our families."

During the 2000 campaign, Bush cast himself as a "compassionate conservative" and promised to improve schools and win the prescription drug benefit for the elderly.

"Broadly defined, President Bush sees his major role as being one of moral leadership," says Vin Weber, 53, a former Republican congressman from Minnesota who advises the White House.

To his detractors, Bush lives in a world of black and white, failing to see the shades of gray that they believe determine nuanced, and successful, policy.

"He's a person who is convinced of his own rectitude," historian Kutler says. "Forty-some years ago, we had a wonderful slogan that I think worked very well, and that is, politics is the art of the possible, which meant that there was give and take. There's none of that here."

Across the Aisle

In past administrations, presidents pursued friends across "the aisle," as the dividing line between Democrats and Republicans in the Senate and House is known in Washington.

President Bill Clinton, the Democrat who served between Bush and his father, appointed a Republican -- William Cohen -- as his defense secretary.

Bush's White House lacks such relationships, lawmakers say. David Obey, a Democratic representative from Wisconsin, says the president's approach contrasts with that of the elder Bush.

"His father leaned overboard to work with people," Obey, 67, says.

At a dinner in 2004, Cheney, 64, was asked which congressional Democrats had the closest relationships with the administration. The vice president, who had Democratic friends on Capitol Hill when he represented Wyoming in Congress from 1979 to 1989, first replied "Tom Foley," the former House Speaker who lost his seat in 1994 -- six years before Bush took office.

`A Notorious Phoner'

"We pretty much just deal with the Democratic leadership," Cheney added.

Representative Rahm Emanuel, chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee who once worked as a strategist for Clinton, recalls how Bush's predecessor loved to jawbone lawmakers of both parties in an effort to reach agreement on legislation.

"He was a notorious phoner, would call people at all hours of the day and night, and loved the give-and-take part of the process," Emanuel says of Clinton. "And he developed friendships that way, even with Republicans."

Adds Emanuel, "I don't know of a single member of the Democratic caucus who can talk about any kind of professional or personal relationship with President Bush."

Those frayed ties with lawmakers showed this year, when Bush was pressing his plan to carve private investment accounts out of the Social Security system. The White House made few efforts to reach out to Democrats.

Privatization Plan

Then it discovered that Republicans were also deeply divided over the plan to allow pensioners to invest in the stock and bond markets. Added to that, the plan faced assaults from labor unions and AARP, the largest lobby for elderly Americans, and it ran aground.

Earlier this year, after Bush failed to generate much public support during a nationwide tour to tout his plan, Representative Charles Rangel of New York says he told Bush at a meeting that he could reach a compromise on ensuring the solvency of the system if he'd stop pressing for the accounts.

"He told me, `I am the president of the United States, and privatization will be on the table as long as I am president,"' says Rangel, 75, the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over Social Security.

North Korea

Bush ran for the presidency in 2000, pledging to shun many of the policies of the Clinton administration -- deriding the "nation building" his predecessor had pursued in Bosnia and Haiti, walking away from the Kyoto Protocol on climate change and playing down the importance of getting directly involved with negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians. The Bush White House would handle North Korea in its own way, too.

Lawrence Wilkerson, who served as Powell's chief of staff from 2002 to 2005, says his boss advocated direct negotiations with North Korea to curb the regime's nuclear weapons program. The plan was to "pick up where President Clinton and his administration left off" in negotiations, Powell told reporters on March 6, 2001.

A day later, he came out of a meeting with Bush in the Oval Office and backed away from his remarks. "There was some suggestion that imminent negotiations are about to begin -- that is not the case," Powell said.

It was a victory for Cheney and Rumsfeld, who had little interest in one-on-one meetings with the North Koreans. Cheney appealed to the ranch-owning, cowboy side of Bush, Wilkerson says.

`Real Wishy-Washy'

Powell would sit in the Oval Office and tell Bush, "You've got to talk; you've got to sit down and look across the table with one another," Wilkerson, 60, says. "Sometimes the president would get real wishy-washy on it. And then the vice president would slip in, and the president would put his cowboy hat on and his .45, and you'd have the same old thing."

Supporters say Bush, who declined to comment for this article, seeks more opinions than people realize. "We probably meet with the president more often than we meet with the Senate," says Deborah Pryce, a representative from Ohio who's chairwoman of the House Republican Conference.

Republican leaders meet with Bush at least once a month to hatch strategy on bills, Pryce, 54, says.

Majority Leader Blunt, who has breakfast twice a month with Rove, gives Bush credit for helping him eke out a victory in the House on the Central American Free Trade Agreement. During a White House meeting with Bush, Blunt told the president that more Republicans might support the agreement if they believed the measure would improve national security.

Closed-Door Meeting

The day before the vote, Bush made a rare appearance on Capitol Hill for a closed-door meeting with all House Republicans, Blunt says. He made the case that a growing Central American economy would help the U.S. by stemming illegal immigration and reducing threats of terrorism. The legislation passed 217-215 on July 28.

"He gave every ounce of cooperation from the administration's standpoint that he could possibly give," Blunt says.

Polls taken during the past five years have repeatedly shown that Americans consider the plain-spoken Bush honest and a strong leader, though the scandal surrounding the disclosure of the name of a Central Intelligence Agency operative has eroded that view, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted Oct. 30-Nov. 2.

The president is decisive but not impulsive, says Representative Curt Weldon, 58, a Republican from Pennsylvania and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee.

`Master of Low Expectations'

"He knows what he wants," says Weldon, who estimates he's met with Bush 75 times. "He doesn't put his finger in the air to see what some poll says. He doesn't know the details and mechanics, but he knows what he wants to do."

Bush himself is open about his propensity to shy away from deep thinking and fancy pronouncements. "I'm the master of low expectations," he told reporters aboard Air Force One on June 4, 2003, after brokering talks between then Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas and Israel's Sharon. "I'm not a very formal guy. I'm also not very analytical. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about myself, about why I do things."

Bush also doesn't spend much time getting into the weeds of policy to absorb essential information, his critics say.

After anthrax-laced letters killed five people in the U.S. in late 2001, forcing the shutdown of several Senate offices and postal facilities, Representative Obey joined other congressional leaders at the White House to meet with Bush.

`National Security Risk'

The president arrived and said he had time for three or four questions before departing for another meeting.

Obey, the senior Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, says he asked about four federal installations he had been told were vulnerable to attack. "To put it kindly, if he had been briefed, he gave no evidence thereof," Obey says.

Obey recalls he turned to then House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt as he was leaving the meeting and said, "That man is the biggest national security risk in the United States."

Bush leaves the specifics largely to Cheney and Rove. Rove has been enmeshed in the Bush family since the 1970s, when he began working with the elder Bush as a College Republican, yet his primary ties are to George W. Bush.

When the younger Bush won his race for governor of Texas in 1994, Rove was a chief strategist. Along the way, Rove played a major role in the shift of Texas from a Democrat-controlled state to one run by Republicans.

Power of Cheney and Rove

Last November, Bush called him the "architect" of his re- election.

The power of Cheney and Rove in the White House means that few other stars have emerged from the administration. Powell, 68, who was considered a presidential contender after his successful tenure as chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, left the State Department early in Bush's second term.

Bush replaced him with Rice, his right-hand woman through the first term as national security adviser.

The lack of luminaries in the administration is especially apparent in economic policy making -- all the more striking because of Bush's statements that he strives to run his government as a chief executive officer would govern a corporation.

The administration hasn't produced a single economic policy maker who approaches the stature of Robert Rubin, Clinton's Treasury secretary from 1995 to 1999, or James Baker, who served in that role, among others, during President Ronald Reagan's tenure from 1981 to 1989.

O'Neill Fired

Stephen Friedman, 67, who was co-chairman of Goldman, Sachs & Co. along with Rubin in the early 1990s, served two years as Bush's National Economic Council director, a role that's supposed to place him among the president's top advisers. During his tenure, few of his colleagues could cite a single instance in which Friedman put his stamp on a policy.

Bush fired Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, former CEO of Alcoa Inc., in December 2002 as the economy stalled and after O'Neill had opposed tax cuts and lost battles with the White House on the imposition of steel tariffs.

O'Neill, 69, who had regular meetings with his friend Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, said in the book "The Price of Loyalty" (Simon & Schuster, 2004), written by journalist Ron Suskind, that Bush was disengaged and uninterested in economic policy.

Inner Circle

"If you asked me what's the best job, it may be working closely with Karl Rove, which tells you where a lot of the stuff emanates from," says James Glassman, a senior economist at J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. in New York and a former Fed economist. "It's a different style from Clinton's, which was open forum and open debate."

The inner circle of this White House is also largely built around Cheney. The vice president, who served as George H.W. Bush's defense secretary, led the search for a vice presidential candidate when the younger Bush ran for president in 2000. Bush ended up settling on him.

Then Bush relied on Cheney's relationships in Washington when hiring Rumsfeld, 73, and Paul Wolfowitz, 61, a former Defense Department official who now runs the World Bank.

"Bush has delegated a lot more authority and control to Cheney than any other president," says Joel Goldstein, a vice presidential scholar at the St. Louis University School of Law. "He has authority across the board to act as a chief operating officer."

Advocate for Secrecy

Cheney was one of the most vocal advocates for the invasion of Iraq. He wrote Bush's national energy policy that emphasized production rather than conservation, and he lobbied lawmakers for Bush's tax cuts.

At the same time, Cheney is one of the White House's chief advocates for secrecy. He fought efforts to compel public testimony by Bush and himself before the bipartisan commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks, and he kept outsiders largely in the dark about a task force he ran to devise the energy policy.

Cheney's energy task force didn't hold a single public hearing as he privately got recommendations from major energy companies such as Chevron Corp. and Enron Corp.

Bush adopted the group's recommendations calling for tax breaks for energy companies and the opening of more public land for oil drilling, particularly in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Environmental groups sued, charging the task force with neglecting their concerns and pointing to the episode as a case of partisan pandering.

Outside Attention

Cheney's approach stands in contrast to a similar task force created in 1989 by the elder Bush that was led by then Energy Secretary James Watkins. That group held 18 public hearings.

Cheney's office has been drawing a lot of outside attention since the resignation of Libby, who also served as the vice president's national security adviser. A grand jury investigating who leaked the name of a covert CIA agent charged Libby with making false statements, perjury and obstruction of justice.

The agent, Valerie Plame, is married to former ambassador Joseph Wilson, who publicly criticized Bush's rationale for the war in Iraq. Cheney told Libby that Wilson's wife worked for the agency, according to the indictment. Libby pleaded not guilty on Nov. 3.

Critics say Bush's closed style of management and tendency to rely on relationships to make decisions colored his response to Hurricane Katrina, which claimed more than a thousand lives and destroyed swaths of New Orleans shortly after it came ashore on Aug. 29.

FEMA's Brown

They say the president failed to react quickly enough and had placed the wrong person in one of the most important relief roles -- running the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Michael Brown, 50, Bush's appointment to run FEMA, was a friend of the president's former campaign manager whose most recent job had been as a commissioner for the International Arabian Horse Association from 1991 to 2001.

Brown quit the agency on Sept. 12 amid a hail of criticism that he wasn't qualified to lead. Bush took the heat for elevating Brown to the job.

"Katrina really hit it home that the MBA president failed to be a CEO in a way we thought we had a right to expect," says Barbara Kellerman, a Harvard University professor who specializes in presidential leadership. "If this were the CEO of the company, he'd be booted out."

Ambitious Agenda

Bush's tendency to focus on an ambitious agenda sets him up for great successes and failures, says Stephen Hess, a speechwriter under Republican President Dwight Eisenhower. "He is a bigger-picture person," says Hess, who's now a political analyst at Washington's Brookings Institution. "And that means there is more possibility for big stumbling."

Bush shows few signs of changing his model for decision making, and he may even be taking it a step further. After getting advice from a small group of trusted advisers on whom to nominate for the Supreme Court, he decided to pick one of them - - White House Counsel Harriet Miers.

The October decision stunned even many of his Republican allies in Congress because few of them had been consulted beforehand and because she had little background in constitutional law. Miers withdrew from consideration 24 days later, and Bush then nominated Samuel Alito, a U.S. appeals court judge, for the post.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Kristin Jensen in Washington at  kjensen@bloomberg.net
Richard Keil in Washington at  dkeil@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 21, 2005 00:23 ES

Commentary:
/The idiocy of some in the media continues to boggle my mind. Bush was never a good leader. Recall when he promised to get an "up or down" vote in the UN to "see who was with us and who was against us?" The vote never happened? Why not? Because Bush was going to get his ass kicked in the UN vote so he withdrew his amendment. Was Bush truthful? Did he show resolve? Was he bold? No. The media let him get away with lying to our faces and now still uses words that are fictitious.

Here's the deal. If I tossed a coin and guessed as to whether Bush's intelligence was good or bad, I'd have been 50% right, yet Bush was 100% wrong. A coin toss would have been more right than Bush. For anyone to suggest Bush ever had a clue about what he was doing is pure hogwash. From day one the man has been incompetent, lazy and wrong. I wish historians and others would stop glorifying his stupidity.

Was it "bold" to invade two unarmed countries? Good grief. Insanity continues to reign in the hearts and minds of the certain brain-dead media types. N. Korea said it was armed to the teeth and Bush ran away from them like a coward. When this reporter can explain why going to war with two unarmed countries while at the same time ignoring an armed country is "bold" then and only then should he be allowed to write another story. Where is his editor? Still in a deep slumber? Both this reporter and his editor should to be fired.