Impeach Bush

Prosecutor speaks to Bush in CIA leak probe
June 25, 2004

By Tom Brune
June 25, 2004

WASHINGTON -- A special prosecutor interviewed President George W. Bush for more than an hour in the Oval Office yesterday morning in the probe of who leaked the identity of a covert CIA operative to the news media, a White House spokesman said.

Bush was questioned for about 70 minutes by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney from Chicago appointed to conduct the investigation, and members of his investigative team, said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

With Bush at the session that began about 10:25 a.m. was his private attorney, James Sharp, a Washington defense lawyer and former federal prosecutor the president recently retained to represent him in the leak investigation, McClellan said.

"The leaking of classified information is a very serious matter. The president directed the White House to cooperate fully with those in charge of the investigation. He was pleased to do his part to help the investigation move forward," he said.

The interview with Bush - who was not placed under oath - follows an appearance Friday by White House counsel Alberto Gonzales before the Washington federal grand jury conducting the probe and the questioning Tuesday of a Washington Post reporter at his office.

McClellan revealed little about what transpired during the session, declining to answer questions about whether Bush knew anything about the leak of the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame last summer.

"That's just getting into questions that are best directed to the officials in charge of the investigation," McClellan said. "And I would not read anything into that one way or the other."

Fitzgerald declined to comment through his spokesman, Randall Samborn.

Fitzgerald was appointed six months ago to investigate who in the Bush administration last summer leaked the identity of Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak and reporters.

Plame's husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, has charged Bush administration officials disclosed his wife's identity to attack his credibility because he criticized the administration's claims that Iraq had tried to obtain uranium from Niger, a possibility he had earlier checked out for the CIA and determined to be highly unlikely. It is illegal under federal law to knowingly and purposely reveal the identity of a covert intelligence operative.

In his book, "The Politics of Truth," Wilson said based on information from unnamed sources he blamed the leak on Lewis I. "Scooter" Libby, an aide to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Last year, McClellan said Libby, White House aide Elliot Abrams and political director Karl Rove had assured him they did not leak Plame's name.

On Tuesday, Fitzgerald and his team questioned Washington Post reporter Glenn Kessler in a tape-recorded session about two conversations he had with Libby last summer. Kessler told them Plame and Wilson did not come up in those conversations, the Washington Post reported.

Cheney also was interviewed by Fitzgerald, according to published reports.

Fitzgerald last month issued subpoenas to Time and NBC News to compel reporter Matt Cooper and news show host Tim Russert to answer questions. The magazine and news network are fighting to quash the subpoenas.

Fitzgerald also sought to talk to another reporter at The Washington Post and two reporters at Newsday.
Copyright © 2004, Newsday, Inc. |  Article licensing and reprint options

Recall how the New York Times manufactured the Whitewater scandal? There wasn't a single piece of evidence that crimes were committed in Whitewater but the media soon became lap-dogs to the republican party and started demanding a special prosecutor. Why? Because they could. It haunted Bill Clinton for eight years.

Now we have real crimes by a sitting president and they're felonies. We hear little or almost nothing about it. We know for example that at least six reporters were called by White House Staff to leak the CIA operatives name. Why won't these reporters tell us whom in the White House broke the law --s it because of morals, standards or ethics? After so many years of lying to us about Clinton and WMD it seems odd they now "see the light."

When felonies are committed in the White House by Bush or his staff the media snores. But when the media wanted to manufacture scandals against Clinton they made it headline news. We shouldn't be surprised...the same news organization that pushed Whitewater (all of them), also pushed WMD even though both were based on lies. Our media remains severely dysfunctional. Why didn't ONE reporter ask Bush for a single piece of evidence proving WMD or a link to Al-Qaeda? Why didn't one reporter verify the lies put out by the New York Times on Whitewater?

Are American reporters lazy, inept or corrupt. You decide. Is Bush lazy, inept or corrupt? You decide. It's not hard to see why the media loves(d) this president. Facts remain malleable to both.